乌拉圭物理教师和学生对科学的态度和信念是什么?

Alvaro Suárez, Daniel Baccino, Martín Monteiro, Arturo C. Martí
{"title":"乌拉圭物理教师和学生对科学的态度和信念是什么?","authors":"Alvaro Suárez, Daniel Baccino, Martín Monteiro, Arturo C. Martí","doi":"10.36411/aef.3.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the epistemological conceptions of the uruguayan Physics teachers and future Physics teachers through the application of the CLASS test (Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey), one of the most accepted instruments in the research community in Physics education. The results obtained allow us to compare the attitudes and beliefs about science of both groups and quantitatively evaluate the agreement or not with the conceptions of experts in the field. First, we present a general screenshot of the responses and then we identify categories in which there are significant similarities or differences between the two groups studied and in turn with the reference of the experts. The categories that show significant positive or negative variations between the opinions of future teachers and teachers indicate the areas where training is favorable or unfavorable. On the other hand, the areas where the differences with the opinions of the experts are globally notorious suggest that they should be strengthened. To get a more global perspective, we also compare our results with those published in the literature. Finally, we raise several questions that we think may favor further inquiries.","PeriodicalId":101894,"journal":{"name":"Enseñanza de la Física","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Cuáles son las actitudes y creencias en torno a la Ciencia de los profesores y estudiantes de profesorado de Física del Uruguay?\",\"authors\":\"Alvaro Suárez, Daniel Baccino, Martín Monteiro, Arturo C. Martí\",\"doi\":\"10.36411/aef.3.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the epistemological conceptions of the uruguayan Physics teachers and future Physics teachers through the application of the CLASS test (Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey), one of the most accepted instruments in the research community in Physics education. The results obtained allow us to compare the attitudes and beliefs about science of both groups and quantitatively evaluate the agreement or not with the conceptions of experts in the field. First, we present a general screenshot of the responses and then we identify categories in which there are significant similarities or differences between the two groups studied and in turn with the reference of the experts. The categories that show significant positive or negative variations between the opinions of future teachers and teachers indicate the areas where training is favorable or unfavorable. On the other hand, the areas where the differences with the opinions of the experts are globally notorious suggest that they should be strengthened. To get a more global perspective, we also compare our results with those published in the literature. Finally, we raise several questions that we think may favor further inquiries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enseñanza de la Física\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enseñanza de la Física\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36411/aef.3.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enseñanza de la Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36411/aef.3.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们通过应用CLASS测试(科罗拉多关于科学的学习态度调查)来调查乌拉圭物理教师和未来物理教师的认识论概念,CLASS测试是物理教育研究界最受欢迎的工具之一。所获得的结果使我们能够比较两组对科学的态度和信念,并定量评估是否与该领域专家的概念一致。首先,我们给出回答的一般截图,然后我们确定两组研究之间存在显著相似或差异的类别,并依次参考专家的意见。在未来教师和教师的意见之间表现出显著的积极或消极变化的类别表明培训有利或不利的领域。另一方面,与专家意见不同的领域在全球范围内臭名昭著,这表明它们应该得到加强。为了获得更全面的视角,我们还将我们的结果与文献中发表的结果进行了比较。最后,我们提出了几个我们认为可能有利于进一步调查的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
¿Cuáles son las actitudes y creencias en torno a la Ciencia de los profesores y estudiantes de profesorado de Física del Uruguay?
We investigate the epistemological conceptions of the uruguayan Physics teachers and future Physics teachers through the application of the CLASS test (Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey), one of the most accepted instruments in the research community in Physics education. The results obtained allow us to compare the attitudes and beliefs about science of both groups and quantitatively evaluate the agreement or not with the conceptions of experts in the field. First, we present a general screenshot of the responses and then we identify categories in which there are significant similarities or differences between the two groups studied and in turn with the reference of the experts. The categories that show significant positive or negative variations between the opinions of future teachers and teachers indicate the areas where training is favorable or unfavorable. On the other hand, the areas where the differences with the opinions of the experts are globally notorious suggest that they should be strengthened. To get a more global perspective, we also compare our results with those published in the literature. Finally, we raise several questions that we think may favor further inquiries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信