比较来自墨西哥三所大学的全职科学家的研究概念*

Q3 Social Sciences
Alfredo de la Lama García , Davide E. Daturi , Marco A. de la Lama Zubirán
{"title":"比较来自墨西哥三所大学的全职科学家的研究概念*","authors":"Alfredo de la Lama García ,&nbsp;Davide E. Daturi ,&nbsp;Marco A. de la Lama Zubirán","doi":"10.1016/j.resu.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article analyzes the degree to which scientists at three Mexican higher education institutions ascribe to mainstream scientific protocols and values, as part of a broader analysis of the scientific research environment at those institutions. Specifically, we compared the views of full-time researchers at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (<span>uaem</span>), with those of their counterparts at the leading universities in the capital, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (<span>unam</span>) and the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (<span>uam</span>). In total, we conducted interviews with 270 full-time researchers. The results show a tendency toward humanistic, pedagogical, ethical and socio-curricular approaches, with a range of strategies being employed by different actors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2015.12.002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación de las nociones sobre la investigación que tienen los científicos de tiempo completo de tres universidades de México*\",\"authors\":\"Alfredo de la Lama García ,&nbsp;Davide E. Daturi ,&nbsp;Marco A. de la Lama Zubirán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resu.2015.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article analyzes the degree to which scientists at three Mexican higher education institutions ascribe to mainstream scientific protocols and values, as part of a broader analysis of the scientific research environment at those institutions. Specifically, we compared the views of full-time researchers at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (<span>uaem</span>), with those of their counterparts at the leading universities in the capital, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (<span>unam</span>) and the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (<span>uam</span>). In total, we conducted interviews with 270 full-time researchers. The results show a tendency toward humanistic, pedagogical, ethical and socio-curricular approaches, with a range of strategies being employed by different actors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Educacion Superior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2015.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Educacion Superior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018527601500117X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S018527601500117X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了墨西哥三所高等教育机构的科学家对主流科学协议和价值观的认同程度,这是对这些机构的科研环境进行更广泛分析的一部分。具体来说,我们比较了Autónoma墨西哥大学(uaem)的全职研究人员与首都主要大学,国立大学Autónoma墨西哥大学(unam)和Autónoma大都会大学(uam)的同行的观点。我们总共采访了270名全职研究人员。结果显示出人文、教学、伦理和社会课程方法的趋势,不同的参与者采用了一系列策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparación de las nociones sobre la investigación que tienen los científicos de tiempo completo de tres universidades de México*

This article analyzes the degree to which scientists at three Mexican higher education institutions ascribe to mainstream scientific protocols and values, as part of a broader analysis of the scientific research environment at those institutions. Specifically, we compared the views of full-time researchers at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (uaem), with those of their counterparts at the leading universities in the capital, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (unam) and the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (uam). In total, we conducted interviews with 270 full-time researchers. The results show a tendency toward humanistic, pedagogical, ethical and socio-curricular approaches, with a range of strategies being employed by different actors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de la Educacion Superior
Revista de la Educacion Superior Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de la Educación Superior (RESU) es un medio que se propone publicar textos académicos originales sobre la educación superior mexicana, con apertura a la dimensión internacional. Sus destinatarios son tanto investigadores que trabajan temas de educación superior como directivos, especialistas e interesados en planeación, evaluación y gestión de las instituciones y sistemas de educación superior. Por consiguiente, se difunden artículos de investigación, ensayos académicos y reseñas críticas, que propicien que los lectores enriquezcan su bagaje conceptual y analítico, y amplíen su conocimiento acerca de los retos que enfrentan los sistemas e instituciones de educación superior en los entornos nacional e internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信