接近诺福克岛的史前

Atholl Anderson, P. White
{"title":"接近诺福克岛的史前","authors":"Atholl Anderson, P. White","doi":"10.3853/J.0812-7387.27.2001.1335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Norfolk Island, on the northeast edge of the Tasman Sea, is of volcanic origin and moderate height. A humid, forested subtropical landmass, it had a diverse range of natural resources, including some food plants such as Cyathea, forest birds such as pigeon and parrot species and substantial colonies of seabirds, notably boobies and procellariids. Its shoreline had few shellfish, but the coastal waters were rich in fish, of which Lethrinids were especially abundant. The island had no inhabitants when discovered by Europeans in A.D. 1774. It was settled by them in A.D. 1788. From the eighteenth century discovery of feral bananas and then of stone adzes, knowledge of the prehistory of Norfolk Island has developed over a very long period. Collections of stone tools seemed predominantly East Polynesian in orientation, but Melanesian sources could not be ruled out. Research on fossil bone deposits established the antiquity of the human commensal Rattus exulans as about 800 B.P. but no prehistoric settlement site was known until one was discovered in 1995 at Emily Bay during the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project. ANDERSON, ATHOLL, AND PETER WHITE, 2001a. Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island. In The Prehistoric Archaeology of Norfolk Island, Southwest Pacific, ed. Atholl Anderson and Peter White, pp. 1–9. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27. Sydney: Australian Museum. The primary aim of the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project (NIPP), which began in 1995, was to determine the fact, extent and nature of pre-European settlement in the Norfolk Island archipelago, within the context of some wider questions of regional prehistory. Norfolk Island was of particular interest because of its status as one of the Polynesian “mystery” islands, its very isolated situation at the western extremity of Polynesian colonization, yet its proximity to Melanesia, and because of its history of tantalising evidence indicating former settlement. That was not immediately apparent at European discovery. Ten days out from New Caledonia, on the 10th October 1774, HMS Resolution came upon a new island. A brief exploration suggested that it was uninhabited and Captain James Cook “took posission of this Isle... and named it Norfolk Isle, in honour of that noble family.” (Beaglehole, 1961: 565). An absence of indigenous people was confirmed when extensive exploration and European settlement began in 1788, but at the same time evidence began to emerge of former habitation (below) and Norfolk Island became one of those “isolated, mystery islands” of Polynesia, “which have traces of prehistoric settlement, but which had no inhabitants at European contact.” (Bellwood 1978: 352). These islands occur in two main groups, equatorial atolls and sub-tropical high islands, of which Norfolk Island is the most westerly and was before our research perhaps the most enigmatic. Located almost equidistant between New Caledonia and New Zealand, it was open to settlement from either or both sources (if not others). New Caledonia and New Zealand represent the extremes of culture history in Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 1–9. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9","PeriodicalId":371360,"journal":{"name":"Records of The Australian Museum, Supplement","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island\",\"authors\":\"Atholl Anderson, P. White\",\"doi\":\"10.3853/J.0812-7387.27.2001.1335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Norfolk Island, on the northeast edge of the Tasman Sea, is of volcanic origin and moderate height. A humid, forested subtropical landmass, it had a diverse range of natural resources, including some food plants such as Cyathea, forest birds such as pigeon and parrot species and substantial colonies of seabirds, notably boobies and procellariids. Its shoreline had few shellfish, but the coastal waters were rich in fish, of which Lethrinids were especially abundant. The island had no inhabitants when discovered by Europeans in A.D. 1774. It was settled by them in A.D. 1788. From the eighteenth century discovery of feral bananas and then of stone adzes, knowledge of the prehistory of Norfolk Island has developed over a very long period. Collections of stone tools seemed predominantly East Polynesian in orientation, but Melanesian sources could not be ruled out. Research on fossil bone deposits established the antiquity of the human commensal Rattus exulans as about 800 B.P. but no prehistoric settlement site was known until one was discovered in 1995 at Emily Bay during the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project. ANDERSON, ATHOLL, AND PETER WHITE, 2001a. Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island. In The Prehistoric Archaeology of Norfolk Island, Southwest Pacific, ed. Atholl Anderson and Peter White, pp. 1–9. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27. Sydney: Australian Museum. The primary aim of the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project (NIPP), which began in 1995, was to determine the fact, extent and nature of pre-European settlement in the Norfolk Island archipelago, within the context of some wider questions of regional prehistory. Norfolk Island was of particular interest because of its status as one of the Polynesian “mystery” islands, its very isolated situation at the western extremity of Polynesian colonization, yet its proximity to Melanesia, and because of its history of tantalising evidence indicating former settlement. That was not immediately apparent at European discovery. Ten days out from New Caledonia, on the 10th October 1774, HMS Resolution came upon a new island. A brief exploration suggested that it was uninhabited and Captain James Cook “took posission of this Isle... and named it Norfolk Isle, in honour of that noble family.” (Beaglehole, 1961: 565). An absence of indigenous people was confirmed when extensive exploration and European settlement began in 1788, but at the same time evidence began to emerge of former habitation (below) and Norfolk Island became one of those “isolated, mystery islands” of Polynesia, “which have traces of prehistoric settlement, but which had no inhabitants at European contact.” (Bellwood 1978: 352). These islands occur in two main groups, equatorial atolls and sub-tropical high islands, of which Norfolk Island is the most westerly and was before our research perhaps the most enigmatic. Located almost equidistant between New Caledonia and New Zealand, it was open to settlement from either or both sources (if not others). New Caledonia and New Zealand represent the extremes of culture history in Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 1–9. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9\",\"PeriodicalId\":371360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Records of The Australian Museum, Supplement\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Records of The Australian Museum, Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3853/J.0812-7387.27.2001.1335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records of The Australian Museum, Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3853/J.0812-7387.27.2001.1335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

诺福克岛,在塔斯曼海的东北边缘,是火山起源和中等高度。它是一个潮湿的亚热带森林大陆,拥有各种各样的自然资源,包括一些食用植物,如Cyathea,森林鸟类,如鸽子和鹦鹉,以及大量的海鸟,特别是鲣鸟和procellariids。它的海岸线上很少有贝类,但沿海水域有丰富的鱼类,其中Lethrinids尤其丰富。公元1774年欧洲人发现该岛时,岛上还没有居民。他们于公元1788年定居于此。从18世纪发现野生香蕉,到后来发现石制小锛,诺福克岛的史前知识经历了很长一段时间的发展。石器收藏品的方向似乎主要是东波利尼西亚人,但也不能排除美拉尼西亚人的来源。对骨骼化石沉积物的研究表明,人类共栖鼠的历史大约在公元前800年左右,但直到1995年在诺福克岛史前史项目期间在艾米丽湾发现了一个史前定居点,人们才知道它的存在。阿索尔。安德森和彼得。怀特,2001。接近诺福克岛的史前。《诺福克岛的史前考古》,西南太平洋,阿索尔·安德森和彼得·怀特主编,第1-9页。《澳大利亚博物馆志》,增刊27。悉尼:澳大利亚博物馆。诺福克岛史前史项目(NIPP)始于1995年,其主要目的是在一些更广泛的地区史前史问题的背景下,确定欧洲人在诺福克岛群岛定居的事实、范围和性质。诺福克岛之所以引起人们的特别兴趣,是因为它作为波利尼西亚“神秘”岛屿之一的地位,它在波利尼西亚殖民地的西端非常孤立,但它靠近美拉尼西亚,而且因为它的历史上有诱人的证据表明曾经有过定居点。这一点在欧洲的发现中并没有立即显现出来。1774年10月10日,从新喀里多尼亚出发十天后,HMS Resolution号来到了一个新岛屿。一次简短的考察表明,该岛无人居住,詹姆斯·库克船长“接管了这个岛……并将其命名为诺福克岛,以纪念那个高贵的家族。(Beaglehole, 1961: 565)。当1788年开始大规模的探险和欧洲人的定居时,土著居民的缺失得到了证实,但与此同时,以前有人居住的证据开始出现(见下图),诺福克岛成为波利尼西亚那些“孤立的、神秘的岛屿”之一,“那里有史前定居的痕迹,但没有与欧洲人接触的居民”。(Bellwood 1978: 352)。这些岛屿主要分为两组,赤道环礁和亚热带高原岛屿,其中诺福克岛最西端,在我们的研究之前可能是最神秘的。它位于新喀里多尼亚和新西兰之间,距离几乎相等,可以从任何一个或两个来源(如果不是其他来源)定居。新喀里多尼亚和新西兰代表了文化史的极端,见《澳大利亚博物馆志》,增刊27(2001):1-9。Isbn 0 7347 2305
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island
Norfolk Island, on the northeast edge of the Tasman Sea, is of volcanic origin and moderate height. A humid, forested subtropical landmass, it had a diverse range of natural resources, including some food plants such as Cyathea, forest birds such as pigeon and parrot species and substantial colonies of seabirds, notably boobies and procellariids. Its shoreline had few shellfish, but the coastal waters were rich in fish, of which Lethrinids were especially abundant. The island had no inhabitants when discovered by Europeans in A.D. 1774. It was settled by them in A.D. 1788. From the eighteenth century discovery of feral bananas and then of stone adzes, knowledge of the prehistory of Norfolk Island has developed over a very long period. Collections of stone tools seemed predominantly East Polynesian in orientation, but Melanesian sources could not be ruled out. Research on fossil bone deposits established the antiquity of the human commensal Rattus exulans as about 800 B.P. but no prehistoric settlement site was known until one was discovered in 1995 at Emily Bay during the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project. ANDERSON, ATHOLL, AND PETER WHITE, 2001a. Approaching the prehistory of Norfolk Island. In The Prehistoric Archaeology of Norfolk Island, Southwest Pacific, ed. Atholl Anderson and Peter White, pp. 1–9. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27. Sydney: Australian Museum. The primary aim of the Norfolk Island Prehistory Project (NIPP), which began in 1995, was to determine the fact, extent and nature of pre-European settlement in the Norfolk Island archipelago, within the context of some wider questions of regional prehistory. Norfolk Island was of particular interest because of its status as one of the Polynesian “mystery” islands, its very isolated situation at the western extremity of Polynesian colonization, yet its proximity to Melanesia, and because of its history of tantalising evidence indicating former settlement. That was not immediately apparent at European discovery. Ten days out from New Caledonia, on the 10th October 1774, HMS Resolution came upon a new island. A brief exploration suggested that it was uninhabited and Captain James Cook “took posission of this Isle... and named it Norfolk Isle, in honour of that noble family.” (Beaglehole, 1961: 565). An absence of indigenous people was confirmed when extensive exploration and European settlement began in 1788, but at the same time evidence began to emerge of former habitation (below) and Norfolk Island became one of those “isolated, mystery islands” of Polynesia, “which have traces of prehistoric settlement, but which had no inhabitants at European contact.” (Bellwood 1978: 352). These islands occur in two main groups, equatorial atolls and sub-tropical high islands, of which Norfolk Island is the most westerly and was before our research perhaps the most enigmatic. Located almost equidistant between New Caledonia and New Zealand, it was open to settlement from either or both sources (if not others). New Caledonia and New Zealand represent the extremes of culture history in Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 1–9. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信