鲁棒系统设计软误差注入技术的定量评价

Hyungmin Cho, S. Mirkhani, Chen-Yong Cher, J. Abraham, S. Mitra
{"title":"鲁棒系统设计软误差注入技术的定量评价","authors":"Hyungmin Cho, S. Mirkhani, Chen-Yong Cher, J. Abraham, S. Mitra","doi":"10.1145/2463209.2488859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Choosing the correct error injection technique is of primary importance in simulation-based design and evaluation of robust systems that are resilient to soft errors. Many low-level (e.g., flip-flop-level) error injection techniques are generally used for small systems due to long execution times and significant memory requirements. High-level error injections at the architecture or memory levels are generally fast but can be inaccurate. Unfortunately, there exists very little research literature on quantitative analysis of the inaccuracies associated with high-level error injection techniques. In this paper, we use simulation and emulation results to understand the accuracy tradeoffs associated with a variety of high-level error injection techniques. A detailed analysis of error propagation explains the causes of high degrees of inaccuracies associated with error injection techniques at higher levels of abstraction.","PeriodicalId":320207,"journal":{"name":"2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"209","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative evaluation of soft error injection techniques for robust system design\",\"authors\":\"Hyungmin Cho, S. Mirkhani, Chen-Yong Cher, J. Abraham, S. Mitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2463209.2488859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Choosing the correct error injection technique is of primary importance in simulation-based design and evaluation of robust systems that are resilient to soft errors. Many low-level (e.g., flip-flop-level) error injection techniques are generally used for small systems due to long execution times and significant memory requirements. High-level error injections at the architecture or memory levels are generally fast but can be inaccurate. Unfortunately, there exists very little research literature on quantitative analysis of the inaccuracies associated with high-level error injection techniques. In this paper, we use simulation and emulation results to understand the accuracy tradeoffs associated with a variety of high-level error injection techniques. A detailed analysis of error propagation explains the causes of high degrees of inaccuracies associated with error injection techniques at higher levels of abstraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"209\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2463209.2488859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2463209.2488859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 209

摘要

选择正确的错误注入技术对于基于仿真的鲁棒系统的软错误弹性设计和评估至关重要。许多低级(例如,触发器级)错误注入技术通常用于小型系统,因为执行时间长,内存需求大。架构或内存级别的高级错误注入通常很快,但可能不准确。不幸的是,很少有研究文献对与高级错误注入技术相关的不准确性进行定量分析。在本文中,我们使用仿真和仿真结果来理解与各种高级错误注入技术相关的精度权衡。对错误传播的详细分析解释了在更高抽象级别上与错误注入技术相关的高度不准确性的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative evaluation of soft error injection techniques for robust system design
Choosing the correct error injection technique is of primary importance in simulation-based design and evaluation of robust systems that are resilient to soft errors. Many low-level (e.g., flip-flop-level) error injection techniques are generally used for small systems due to long execution times and significant memory requirements. High-level error injections at the architecture or memory levels are generally fast but can be inaccurate. Unfortunately, there exists very little research literature on quantitative analysis of the inaccuracies associated with high-level error injection techniques. In this paper, we use simulation and emulation results to understand the accuracy tradeoffs associated with a variety of high-level error injection techniques. A detailed analysis of error propagation explains the causes of high degrees of inaccuracies associated with error injection techniques at higher levels of abstraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信