Banu Arıcıoğlu, I. Arslan, Z. Duymus, Davut Çelik
{"title":"Comparıson of calcıum hydroxıde removal effıcacy of dıfferent irrıgatıon systems and photon–Induced photoacustıc streamıng technıque","authors":"Banu Arıcıoğlu, I. Arslan, Z. Duymus, Davut Çelik","doi":"10.4103/JDL.JDL_8_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the irrigation techniques including Vibringe Sonic Irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and conventional needle irrigation (CNI) used to remove the calcium hydroxide (CH) from the artificial groove. Subjects and Methods: Ninety-four teeth extracted human mandibular premolars having single root and linear canal were instrumented with ProTaper system up to size 50. As a standard groove model was designed in the apex of the root's half part. The samples were divided into four experimental groups (n = 21). The techniques were applied for experimental groups as Vibringe (Group 1), PUI (Group 2), PIPS (Group 3), and CNI (Group 4). The residual amount of CH was measured with a stereomicroscope at × 15 magnification by scoring system. The obtained data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests (P < 0.001). Results: CH residues in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 2 (PUI) were statistically significantly lower than those in Group 1 (Vibringe) and Group 4 (CNI) (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference either between PIPS and PUI groups (P > 0.001) or between Vibringe and CNI groups (P > 0.001). Conclusions: PUI and PIPS techniques could remove but not clean up CH residues from the artificial grooves. In addition, the sonic irrigation technique through the Vibringe device was similar to CNI method in the effectiveness of removal of CH in root canal apices.","PeriodicalId":345720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Lasers","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JDL.JDL_8_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定包括振动声波冲洗、被动超声冲洗(PUI)、光子诱导光声流(PIPS)和传统针刺冲洗(CNI)在内的冲洗技术用于去除人工沟槽中氢氧化钙(CH)的有效性。对象与方法:采用ProTaper系统对94颗拔除的单根直管下颌前磨牙进行固定,最大尺寸为50。作为标准的沟槽模型,在根的半部分顶端设计。将样本分为4个实验组(n = 21)。实验分为Vibringe组(1组)、PUI组(2组)、PIPS组(3组)和CNI组(4组)。采用记分法,在体视显微镜下以15倍倍率测量CH残留量。所得资料采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney u检验进行统计学分析(P < 0.001)。结果:3组(PIPS)和2组(PUI)的CH残留量显著低于1组(Vibringe)和4组(CNI) (P < 0.001)。PIPS组与PUI组、Vibringe组与CNI组间差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.001)。结论:PUI和PIPS技术可以去除人工沟槽中的氯甲烷残留,但不能完全清除。此外,通过Vibringe装置的超声灌洗技术与CNI方法在根管根尖CH的去除效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparıson of calcıum hydroxıde removal effıcacy of dıfferent irrıgatıon systems and photon–Induced photoacustıc streamıng technıque
Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the irrigation techniques including Vibringe Sonic Irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and conventional needle irrigation (CNI) used to remove the calcium hydroxide (CH) from the artificial groove. Subjects and Methods: Ninety-four teeth extracted human mandibular premolars having single root and linear canal were instrumented with ProTaper system up to size 50. As a standard groove model was designed in the apex of the root's half part. The samples were divided into four experimental groups (n = 21). The techniques were applied for experimental groups as Vibringe (Group 1), PUI (Group 2), PIPS (Group 3), and CNI (Group 4). The residual amount of CH was measured with a stereomicroscope at × 15 magnification by scoring system. The obtained data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests (P < 0.001). Results: CH residues in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 2 (PUI) were statistically significantly lower than those in Group 1 (Vibringe) and Group 4 (CNI) (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference either between PIPS and PUI groups (P > 0.001) or between Vibringe and CNI groups (P > 0.001). Conclusions: PUI and PIPS techniques could remove but not clean up CH residues from the artificial grooves. In addition, the sonic irrigation technique through the Vibringe device was similar to CNI method in the effectiveness of removal of CH in root canal apices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信