对需求建模实践状态的回顾

M. D. Lubars, C. Potts, C. Richter
{"title":"对需求建模实践状态的回顾","authors":"M. D. Lubars, C. Potts, C. Richter","doi":"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field study of ten organizations was conducted to determine their current practices on definition, interpretation, analysis, and use of the requirements for their software systems and products. The field study consisted of a series of in-depth, structured interviews with practitioners of various kinds. The findings of this study are summarized, and the implications for improving practice either by organizational and methodological interventions or by introducing new technology are explained.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":375368,"journal":{"name":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"330","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of the state of the practice in requirements modeling\",\"authors\":\"M. D. Lubars, C. Potts, C. Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field study of ten organizations was conducted to determine their current practices on definition, interpretation, analysis, and use of the requirements for their software systems and products. The field study consisted of a series of in-depth, structured interviews with practitioners of various kinds. The findings of this study are summarized, and the implications for improving practice either by organizational and methodological interventions or by introducing new technology are explained.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"330\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 330

摘要

对十个组织进行了实地研究,以确定他们在定义、解释、分析和使用软件系统和产品需求方面的当前实践。实地研究包括一系列深入的、有组织的对各类从业人员的访谈。总结了本研究的发现,并解释了通过组织和方法干预或引入新技术来改进实践的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of the state of the practice in requirements modeling
A field study of ten organizations was conducted to determine their current practices on definition, interpretation, analysis, and use of the requirements for their software systems and products. The field study consisted of a series of in-depth, structured interviews with practitioners of various kinds. The findings of this study are summarized, and the implications for improving practice either by organizational and methodological interventions or by introducing new technology are explained.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信