哮喘处方模式的评价:来自巴基斯坦的一项多中心前瞻性观察研究

Muhammad Mubashir Shah, Abdullah Dayo, Ubed ur Rahman Mughal, Nabeela Latif, Nargis Saharan
{"title":"哮喘处方模式的评价:来自巴基斯坦的一项多中心前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Muhammad Mubashir Shah, Abdullah Dayo, Ubed ur Rahman Mughal, Nabeela Latif, Nargis Saharan","doi":"10.38106/lmrj.2023.5.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asthma is a common allergic reaction and a number of drugs are available. This study was conducted to evaluate the prescribing pattern and usage of anti-asthma medications at different medical setups in Hyderabad. The study was conducted from August 2017 to July 2018. A total of 1000 patients from different medical setups diagnosed with asthma were recruited. A pre-designed, detailed questionnaire was used for their data collection. Their prescriptions were collected to evaluate and compare them with the standard guidelines of GINA. The prescribing pattern of anti-asthma was assessed regarding the type of therapy, route of administration, single or multiple treatments, class of drugs, doses, and frequency. Demographically, more asthmatics were found be males (i.e 73.5%), 46.5% were adults, 58.3% from urban areas and 51.68% of the sample had outdoor jobs, while 41.5% of illiterate people were found to be asthmatic. A major type of asthma was persistent at 65.3%. A maximum prescription of 85.5% for asthma management was combined therapy. From long-term use, the monotherapy ICS group was reported in a considerable number (44.13%) (i.e. Beclomethasone in 70% and Budesonide in 7%). Prescriptions of multiple routes of administration were comparatively higher (79.5%). The study concluded that male, young, urban, illiterate and people with outdoor jobs were more likely to get asthma. Preventer drugs were prescribed more in combined therapy, in which Fluticasone + Salmeterol were preferred. The oral inhalational route was selected more. The treatment pattern was consistent with standard guidelines.","PeriodicalId":184438,"journal":{"name":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of pattern of prescription for Asthma : A multicentre prospective observational study from Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Mubashir Shah, Abdullah Dayo, Ubed ur Rahman Mughal, Nabeela Latif, Nargis Saharan\",\"doi\":\"10.38106/lmrj.2023.5.1.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asthma is a common allergic reaction and a number of drugs are available. This study was conducted to evaluate the prescribing pattern and usage of anti-asthma medications at different medical setups in Hyderabad. The study was conducted from August 2017 to July 2018. A total of 1000 patients from different medical setups diagnosed with asthma were recruited. A pre-designed, detailed questionnaire was used for their data collection. Their prescriptions were collected to evaluate and compare them with the standard guidelines of GINA. The prescribing pattern of anti-asthma was assessed regarding the type of therapy, route of administration, single or multiple treatments, class of drugs, doses, and frequency. Demographically, more asthmatics were found be males (i.e 73.5%), 46.5% were adults, 58.3% from urban areas and 51.68% of the sample had outdoor jobs, while 41.5% of illiterate people were found to be asthmatic. A major type of asthma was persistent at 65.3%. A maximum prescription of 85.5% for asthma management was combined therapy. From long-term use, the monotherapy ICS group was reported in a considerable number (44.13%) (i.e. Beclomethasone in 70% and Budesonide in 7%). Prescriptions of multiple routes of administration were comparatively higher (79.5%). The study concluded that male, young, urban, illiterate and people with outdoor jobs were more likely to get asthma. Preventer drugs were prescribed more in combined therapy, in which Fluticasone + Salmeterol were preferred. The oral inhalational route was selected more. The treatment pattern was consistent with standard guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38106/lmrj.2023.5.1.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIAQUAT MEDICAL RESEARCH JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38106/lmrj.2023.5.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哮喘是一种常见的过敏反应,有许多药物可用。本研究旨在评估海德拉巴不同医疗机构抗哮喘药物的处方模式和使用情况。该研究于2017年8月至2018年7月进行。总共招募了1000名来自不同医疗机构的被诊断患有哮喘的患者。他们的数据收集使用了预先设计的详细问卷。收集其处方并与GINA标准指南进行评价比较。对抗哮喘的处方模式进行评估,包括治疗类型、给药途径、单次或多次治疗、药物类别、剂量和频率。在人口统计学上,男性哮喘患者较多(73.5%),成年人占46.5%,58.3%来自城市地区,51.68%的样本从事户外工作,而文盲占41.5%。哮喘的主要类型是持续性哮喘,占65.3%。哮喘治疗的最大处方为联合治疗,占85.5%。从长期使用来看,单药ICS组有相当多的报告(44.13%)(即倍氯米松占70%,布地奈德占7%)。多种给药途径的处方比例较高(79.5%)。该研究得出结论,男性、年轻人、城市居民、文盲和从事户外工作的人更容易患哮喘。预防药物在联合治疗中使用较多,首选氟替卡松+沙美特罗。多选择口服吸入途径。治疗模式与标准指南一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of pattern of prescription for Asthma : A multicentre prospective observational study from Pakistan
Asthma is a common allergic reaction and a number of drugs are available. This study was conducted to evaluate the prescribing pattern and usage of anti-asthma medications at different medical setups in Hyderabad. The study was conducted from August 2017 to July 2018. A total of 1000 patients from different medical setups diagnosed with asthma were recruited. A pre-designed, detailed questionnaire was used for their data collection. Their prescriptions were collected to evaluate and compare them with the standard guidelines of GINA. The prescribing pattern of anti-asthma was assessed regarding the type of therapy, route of administration, single or multiple treatments, class of drugs, doses, and frequency. Demographically, more asthmatics were found be males (i.e 73.5%), 46.5% were adults, 58.3% from urban areas and 51.68% of the sample had outdoor jobs, while 41.5% of illiterate people were found to be asthmatic. A major type of asthma was persistent at 65.3%. A maximum prescription of 85.5% for asthma management was combined therapy. From long-term use, the monotherapy ICS group was reported in a considerable number (44.13%) (i.e. Beclomethasone in 70% and Budesonide in 7%). Prescriptions of multiple routes of administration were comparatively higher (79.5%). The study concluded that male, young, urban, illiterate and people with outdoor jobs were more likely to get asthma. Preventer drugs were prescribed more in combined therapy, in which Fluticasone + Salmeterol were preferred. The oral inhalational route was selected more. The treatment pattern was consistent with standard guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信