家中楼梯数不影响选择性全髋关节置换术后的出院倾向

T. Murtaugh, M. Held, Matthew M. Levitsky, R. Iorio, Alexander L. Neuwirth, J. Geller, H. Cooper, R. Shah
{"title":"家中楼梯数不影响选择性全髋关节置换术后的出院倾向","authors":"T. Murtaugh, M. Held, Matthew M. Levitsky, R. Iorio, Alexander L. Neuwirth, J. Geller, H. Cooper, R. Shah","doi":"10.60118/001c.37880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pragmatic challenges of the patient’s home environment, specifically the number of stairs (NOS) required to enter or navigate a patient’s home may influence discharge destination (DD) and length of stay (LOS) following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study investigates whether the NOS at home predicts discharge to a post-acute-care-facility (PACF) following THA. 548 consecutive THA patients at a single urban arthroplasty center between 2011-2014 were reviewed. Patient factors including age, sex, BMI, length of stay, operative time, Anesthesia Score Assessment (ASA), the Risk-Assessment-and-Prediction-Tool (RAPT) and NOS stairs were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for disposition to PACF. Groups were cohorted by number of stairs, and incidence of PACF discharge was determined. 238 (43.4%) patients were discharged to PACF. The NOS at home had no impact on discharge to PACF (OR 1.02, 95% CI .993-1.04, p=0.209). Older age (OR 1.09, 95% 1.07-1.10, p<0.0001), LOS (OR 1.23, 95% 1.08-1.39, p=0.001), higher ASA (OR 1.74, 95% 1.19-2.53, p=0.004), and lower RAPT score (OR 0.0.865, 95% 0.781-0.958, p=0.005) were significant predictors for disposition to PACF (p<0.005). Female sex was protective in discharge to PACF (OR 0.391, 95% 0.260-0.587, p<0.0001). The incidence of PACF discharge was similar between groups of unavoidable stairs at home. The NOS at home did not influence discharge destination following THA. This retrospective study helps discharge planning and in setting expectations for patients undergoing THA by supporting a home discharge in the setting of unavoidable stairs.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Number of Stairs at Home Does Not Influence Discharge Disposition following Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"T. Murtaugh, M. Held, Matthew M. Levitsky, R. Iorio, Alexander L. Neuwirth, J. Geller, H. Cooper, R. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.37880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pragmatic challenges of the patient’s home environment, specifically the number of stairs (NOS) required to enter or navigate a patient’s home may influence discharge destination (DD) and length of stay (LOS) following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study investigates whether the NOS at home predicts discharge to a post-acute-care-facility (PACF) following THA. 548 consecutive THA patients at a single urban arthroplasty center between 2011-2014 were reviewed. Patient factors including age, sex, BMI, length of stay, operative time, Anesthesia Score Assessment (ASA), the Risk-Assessment-and-Prediction-Tool (RAPT) and NOS stairs were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for disposition to PACF. Groups were cohorted by number of stairs, and incidence of PACF discharge was determined. 238 (43.4%) patients were discharged to PACF. The NOS at home had no impact on discharge to PACF (OR 1.02, 95% CI .993-1.04, p=0.209). Older age (OR 1.09, 95% 1.07-1.10, p<0.0001), LOS (OR 1.23, 95% 1.08-1.39, p=0.001), higher ASA (OR 1.74, 95% 1.19-2.53, p=0.004), and lower RAPT score (OR 0.0.865, 95% 0.781-0.958, p=0.005) were significant predictors for disposition to PACF (p<0.005). Female sex was protective in discharge to PACF (OR 0.391, 95% 0.260-0.587, p<0.0001). The incidence of PACF discharge was similar between groups of unavoidable stairs at home. The NOS at home did not influence discharge destination following THA. This retrospective study helps discharge planning and in setting expectations for patients undergoing THA by supporting a home discharge in the setting of unavoidable stairs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.37880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience &amp; Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.37880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者家庭环境的实际挑战,特别是进入或导航患者家中所需的楼梯数量(NOS)可能会影响初次全髋关节置换术(THA)后的出院目的地(DD)和住院时间(LOS)。本研究探讨了家中NOS是否能预测THA后急性护理设施(PACF)的出院情况。我们回顾了2011-2014年在单个城市关节置换术中心连续548例THA患者。分析患者年龄、性别、BMI、住院时间、手术时间、麻醉评分评估(ASA)、风险评估与预测工具(RAPT)、NOS分级等因素。采用逻辑回归来确定PACF倾向的预测因素。各组按楼梯数分组,并测定PACF的发生率。238例(43.4%)患者出院。家中NOS对PACF放电无影响(OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.993 -1.04, p=0.209)。年龄较大(OR 1.09, 95% 1.07-1.10, p<0.0001)、LOS (OR 1.23, 95% 1.08-1.39, p=0.001)、ASA较高(OR 1.74, 95% 1.19-2.53, p=0.004)、RAPT评分较低(OR 0.865, 95% 0.781-0.958, p=0.005)是PACF倾向的显著预测因素(p<0.005)。女性对PACF排出有保护作用(OR 0.391, 95% 0.260 ~ 0.587, p<0.0001)。在家中不可避免的楼梯组之间,PACF的发生率相似。家中NOS不影响THA术后的出院目的地。本回顾性研究通过支持在不可避免的楼梯设置中家庭出院,有助于制定出院计划并为接受THA的患者设定期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Number of Stairs at Home Does Not Influence Discharge Disposition following Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty
Pragmatic challenges of the patient’s home environment, specifically the number of stairs (NOS) required to enter or navigate a patient’s home may influence discharge destination (DD) and length of stay (LOS) following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). This study investigates whether the NOS at home predicts discharge to a post-acute-care-facility (PACF) following THA. 548 consecutive THA patients at a single urban arthroplasty center between 2011-2014 were reviewed. Patient factors including age, sex, BMI, length of stay, operative time, Anesthesia Score Assessment (ASA), the Risk-Assessment-and-Prediction-Tool (RAPT) and NOS stairs were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for disposition to PACF. Groups were cohorted by number of stairs, and incidence of PACF discharge was determined. 238 (43.4%) patients were discharged to PACF. The NOS at home had no impact on discharge to PACF (OR 1.02, 95% CI .993-1.04, p=0.209). Older age (OR 1.09, 95% 1.07-1.10, p<0.0001), LOS (OR 1.23, 95% 1.08-1.39, p=0.001), higher ASA (OR 1.74, 95% 1.19-2.53, p=0.004), and lower RAPT score (OR 0.0.865, 95% 0.781-0.958, p=0.005) were significant predictors for disposition to PACF (p<0.005). Female sex was protective in discharge to PACF (OR 0.391, 95% 0.260-0.587, p<0.0001). The incidence of PACF discharge was similar between groups of unavoidable stairs at home. The NOS at home did not influence discharge destination following THA. This retrospective study helps discharge planning and in setting expectations for patients undergoing THA by supporting a home discharge in the setting of unavoidable stairs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信