研究经验教训关键特征之间的相互依赖关系:知识共享的整体方法

Yawar Abbas, A. Martinetti, Lex Frunt, Jeroen Klinkers, M. Rajabalinejad, L. V. Dongen
{"title":"研究经验教训关键特征之间的相互依赖关系:知识共享的整体方法","authors":"Yawar Abbas, A. Martinetti, Lex Frunt, Jeroen Klinkers, M. Rajabalinejad, L. V. Dongen","doi":"10.1142/s0219649222500198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is a clear consensus in the literature on the need to share lessons learned, it remains unclear how to properly do so. This paper addresses this point and offers insight into how best to incorporate tacitly held social preferences for developing knowledge-sharing strategies. A descriptive survey was conducted to analyse the knowledge sharing practices for lessons learned within the railway sector. Eight variables are investigated that are derived from the four LEAF features: learnability, embraceability, applicability, and findability. This study revealed that for learnability, storytelling and discussion with colleagues are preferred ways to share personal experiences. Trust and the creation of a learning culture emerged as key aspects of embraceability. With regard to applicability, a process-related knowledge-sharing focus for intraorganisational and a content-related focus for interorganisational knowledge domains are preferred. Better technological findability is identified as a key area of improvement. Finally, novel dependencies are established using the chi-square test between key LEAF features.","PeriodicalId":127309,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Interdependencies Between Key Features of Lessons Learned: An Integral Approach for Knowledge Sharing\",\"authors\":\"Yawar Abbas, A. Martinetti, Lex Frunt, Jeroen Klinkers, M. Rajabalinejad, L. V. Dongen\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0219649222500198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there is a clear consensus in the literature on the need to share lessons learned, it remains unclear how to properly do so. This paper addresses this point and offers insight into how best to incorporate tacitly held social preferences for developing knowledge-sharing strategies. A descriptive survey was conducted to analyse the knowledge sharing practices for lessons learned within the railway sector. Eight variables are investigated that are derived from the four LEAF features: learnability, embraceability, applicability, and findability. This study revealed that for learnability, storytelling and discussion with colleagues are preferred ways to share personal experiences. Trust and the creation of a learning culture emerged as key aspects of embraceability. With regard to applicability, a process-related knowledge-sharing focus for intraorganisational and a content-related focus for interorganisational knowledge domains are preferred. Better technological findability is identified as a key area of improvement. Finally, novel dependencies are established using the chi-square test between key LEAF features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649222500198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Knowl. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649222500198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然文献中对分享经验教训的必要性有明确的共识,但如何正确地这样做仍不清楚。本文解决了这一点,并提供了如何最好地将默认的社会偏好纳入发展知识共享策略的见解。进行了一项描述性调查,以分析铁路部门内的知识共享实践经验教训。研究了从LEAF的四个特征派生的八个变量:可学习性、可接受性、适用性和可查找性。这项研究表明,在可学习性方面,讲故事和与同事讨论是分享个人经历的首选方式。信任和学习型文化的创建成为可接受性的关键方面。就适用性而言,优先考虑组织内部与过程相关的知识共享重点和组织间知识领域与内容相关的重点。更好的技术可寻性被确定为一个关键的改进领域。最后,利用关键LEAF特征之间的卡方检验建立新的依赖关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Interdependencies Between Key Features of Lessons Learned: An Integral Approach for Knowledge Sharing
While there is a clear consensus in the literature on the need to share lessons learned, it remains unclear how to properly do so. This paper addresses this point and offers insight into how best to incorporate tacitly held social preferences for developing knowledge-sharing strategies. A descriptive survey was conducted to analyse the knowledge sharing practices for lessons learned within the railway sector. Eight variables are investigated that are derived from the four LEAF features: learnability, embraceability, applicability, and findability. This study revealed that for learnability, storytelling and discussion with colleagues are preferred ways to share personal experiences. Trust and the creation of a learning culture emerged as key aspects of embraceability. With regard to applicability, a process-related knowledge-sharing focus for intraorganisational and a content-related focus for interorganisational knowledge domains are preferred. Better technological findability is identified as a key area of improvement. Finally, novel dependencies are established using the chi-square test between key LEAF features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信