工党对警察部门的选举建议:走错了路

B. Loveday
{"title":"工党对警察部门的选举建议:走错了路","authors":"B. Loveday","doi":"10.1080/0268117X.2015.1061345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article considers Labour's proposal to replace PCCs with regional police boards, amalgamating police forces and reintroducing indirectly elected councillors to oversee the police. It is based on the recommendations of the Steven's Report which placed a professional policing model at the centre of reform. The failure of this model is being played out daily with reports from the inquiry into the Hillsborough disaster. It recommends instead that PCCs be retained but local Police and Crime Panels be strengthened to oversee the work of PCCs between elections.","PeriodicalId":432339,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Matters","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour's election proposals for the police service:taking the wrong road\",\"authors\":\"B. Loveday\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0268117X.2015.1061345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article considers Labour's proposal to replace PCCs with regional police boards, amalgamating police forces and reintroducing indirectly elected councillors to oversee the police. It is based on the recommendations of the Steven's Report which placed a professional policing model at the centre of reform. The failure of this model is being played out daily with reports from the inquiry into the Hillsborough disaster. It recommends instead that PCCs be retained but local Police and Crime Panels be strengthened to oversee the work of PCCs between elections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2015.1061345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2015.1061345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章考虑了工党的建议,即用地区警察委员会取代警察委员会,合并警察部队,并重新引入间接选举的议员来监督警察。它是基于史蒂文报告的建议,该报告将专业警务模式置于改革的中心。这种模式的失败每天都在希尔斯堡惨案调查报告中上演。委员会建议保留警协,但加强地方警察和犯罪小组,以便在选举期间监督警协的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labour's election proposals for the police service:taking the wrong road
Article considers Labour's proposal to replace PCCs with regional police boards, amalgamating police forces and reintroducing indirectly elected councillors to oversee the police. It is based on the recommendations of the Steven's Report which placed a professional policing model at the centre of reform. The failure of this model is being played out daily with reports from the inquiry into the Hillsborough disaster. It recommends instead that PCCs be retained but local Police and Crime Panels be strengthened to oversee the work of PCCs between elections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信