dfit反排测试反排速率的选择

Rui Wang, A. Dahi Taleghani
{"title":"dfit反排测试反排速率的选择","authors":"Rui Wang, A. Dahi Taleghani","doi":"10.2118/210161-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The DFIT-flowback test has shown some advantages in terms of running time and accuracy over typical injection tests such as DFITs specially in very low permeability formations. However, the success of the test depends largely on choosing an appropriate flowback rate to achieve acceptable results. The hidden assumption behind analysis is assuming uniform closure of fractures at the last step of the tests. Basically, the uniform closure is the only considered form of fracture closure in all the existing analyses for this test. Here, we show how adjusting flowback rates may change fracture closure mode and how to interpret field data accordingly. Often abnormality in the data acquired from pump-in/flowback tests have posed challenges in the widespread application of this test. Here, we use scaling analysis verified by numerical simulations to describe different situations may occur during this test and how to interpret abnormal data. Using scaling analysis does not require running complicated simulations and can provide quick solutions in field operations. Using this method can hopefully make DFIT-flowback more popular in the field.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of the Flowback Rate for DFIT-Flowback Test\",\"authors\":\"Rui Wang, A. Dahi Taleghani\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/210161-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The DFIT-flowback test has shown some advantages in terms of running time and accuracy over typical injection tests such as DFITs specially in very low permeability formations. However, the success of the test depends largely on choosing an appropriate flowback rate to achieve acceptable results. The hidden assumption behind analysis is assuming uniform closure of fractures at the last step of the tests. Basically, the uniform closure is the only considered form of fracture closure in all the existing analyses for this test. Here, we show how adjusting flowback rates may change fracture closure mode and how to interpret field data accordingly. Often abnormality in the data acquired from pump-in/flowback tests have posed challenges in the widespread application of this test. Here, we use scaling analysis verified by numerical simulations to describe different situations may occur during this test and how to interpret abnormal data. Using scaling analysis does not require running complicated simulations and can provide quick solutions in field operations. Using this method can hopefully make DFIT-flowback more popular in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/210161-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210161-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

dfit -反排测试在运行时间和精度方面比典型的注入测试(如dfit)具有一定的优势,特别是在极低渗透率地层中。然而,测试的成功在很大程度上取决于选择合适的返排速率以获得可接受的结果。分析背后隐藏的假设是在测试的最后一步假设裂缝均匀闭合。基本上,均匀闭合是本次试验所有现有分析中唯一考虑的裂缝闭合形式。在这里,我们展示了调整反排速率如何改变裂缝闭合模式,以及如何相应地解释现场数据。从泵入/反排测试中获得的数据经常出现异常,这给该测试的广泛应用带来了挑战。在这里,我们使用经过数值模拟验证的尺度分析来描述测试过程中可能出现的不同情况以及如何解释异常数据。使用尺度分析不需要运行复杂的模拟,可以在现场操作中提供快速解决方案。该方法的应用有望使dfit反排在油田中得到更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of the Flowback Rate for DFIT-Flowback Test
The DFIT-flowback test has shown some advantages in terms of running time and accuracy over typical injection tests such as DFITs specially in very low permeability formations. However, the success of the test depends largely on choosing an appropriate flowback rate to achieve acceptable results. The hidden assumption behind analysis is assuming uniform closure of fractures at the last step of the tests. Basically, the uniform closure is the only considered form of fracture closure in all the existing analyses for this test. Here, we show how adjusting flowback rates may change fracture closure mode and how to interpret field data accordingly. Often abnormality in the data acquired from pump-in/flowback tests have posed challenges in the widespread application of this test. Here, we use scaling analysis verified by numerical simulations to describe different situations may occur during this test and how to interpret abnormal data. Using scaling analysis does not require running complicated simulations and can provide quick solutions in field operations. Using this method can hopefully make DFIT-flowback more popular in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信