{"title":"不相容的目标、不确定的信息和冲突的激励:调度困境","authors":"Kersha Smith","doi":"10.4324/9781315095080-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a series of sensitivity analyses, using a traditional decision tree and Monte Carlo methods, that provide a rational approach for resolving dilemmas posed by conflicting airline dispatch incentives. Adoption of this approach might save the industry millions, but would require a wholesale change in corporate philosophy. The paper advocates incentive structures that place greater value on the process of decisionmaking than in their largely uncontrollable outcomes.","PeriodicalId":249145,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Aerospace Safety","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incompatible goals, uncertain information and conflicting incentives: The dispatch dilemma\",\"authors\":\"Kersha Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315095080-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a series of sensitivity analyses, using a traditional decision tree and Monte Carlo methods, that provide a rational approach for resolving dilemmas posed by conflicting airline dispatch incentives. Adoption of this approach might save the industry millions, but would require a wholesale change in corporate philosophy. The paper advocates incentive structures that place greater value on the process of decisionmaking than in their largely uncontrollable outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Aerospace Safety\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Aerospace Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095080-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Aerospace Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095080-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incompatible goals, uncertain information and conflicting incentives: The dispatch dilemma
This paper presents a series of sensitivity analyses, using a traditional decision tree and Monte Carlo methods, that provide a rational approach for resolving dilemmas posed by conflicting airline dispatch incentives. Adoption of this approach might save the industry millions, but would require a wholesale change in corporate philosophy. The paper advocates incentive structures that place greater value on the process of decisionmaking than in their largely uncontrollable outcomes.