民事诉讼中证据规制的理论方面

C. Murzea
{"title":"民事诉讼中证据规制的理论方面","authors":"C. Murzea","doi":"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our currently used language, the word evidence represents the logical-mental operation by which we attempt to prove something, to demonstrate, to emphasize a certain statement which provides credibility to a particular situation. The institution of evidence in objective law was differently regulated in material law as opposed to procedural law, depending on the different factors which configured private law, but also in direct connection with the lawmaker’s interest. Thus, the current Civil Code no longer contains regulations regarding evidence in antithesis with the 1864 Civil Code; however the institution is regulated in the new Civil Procedure Code, namely law no. 134/2010 regarding the Civil Procedure Code, which would later be republished with subsequent changes. As a consequence, the institution is currently studied in Civil Procedure Law, whereas, before this new regulation, it was studied within the general theory of Civil Law.","PeriodicalId":298214,"journal":{"name":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoretical aspects in regard to the regulation of evidence in the civil lawsuit\",\"authors\":\"C. Murzea\",\"doi\":\"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In our currently used language, the word evidence represents the logical-mental operation by which we attempt to prove something, to demonstrate, to emphasize a certain statement which provides credibility to a particular situation. The institution of evidence in objective law was differently regulated in material law as opposed to procedural law, depending on the different factors which configured private law, but also in direct connection with the lawmaker’s interest. Thus, the current Civil Code no longer contains regulations regarding evidence in antithesis with the 1864 Civil Code; however the institution is regulated in the new Civil Procedure Code, namely law no. 134/2010 regarding the Civil Procedure Code, which would later be republished with subsequent changes. As a consequence, the institution is currently studied in Civil Procedure Law, whereas, before this new regulation, it was studied within the general theory of Civil Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们目前使用的语言中,“证据”这个词代表了一种逻辑心理操作,我们试图通过这种操作来证明某事,展示,强调某种陈述,这种陈述为特定情况提供了可信度。根据构成私法的不同因素,物权法与程序法对物权法中的证据制度进行了不同的规定,但也与立法者的利益直接相关。因此,现行《民法典》不再包含与1864年《民法典》相对立的证据规定;然而,该机构在新的《民事诉讼法》中进行了规定,即第11号法律。第134/2010号关于《民事诉讼法》的规定,该规定将在随后的修改中重新公布。因此,这一制度目前是在民事诉讼法中研究的,而在新规定出台之前,它是在民法一般理论中研究的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoretical aspects in regard to the regulation of evidence in the civil lawsuit
In our currently used language, the word evidence represents the logical-mental operation by which we attempt to prove something, to demonstrate, to emphasize a certain statement which provides credibility to a particular situation. The institution of evidence in objective law was differently regulated in material law as opposed to procedural law, depending on the different factors which configured private law, but also in direct connection with the lawmaker’s interest. Thus, the current Civil Code no longer contains regulations regarding evidence in antithesis with the 1864 Civil Code; however the institution is regulated in the new Civil Procedure Code, namely law no. 134/2010 regarding the Civil Procedure Code, which would later be republished with subsequent changes. As a consequence, the institution is currently studied in Civil Procedure Law, whereas, before this new regulation, it was studied within the general theory of Civil Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信