用眼动追踪研究软件需求审查员的阅读模式和学习风格以提高审查员团队的成果

Anurag Goswami, G. Walia, M. McCourt, Ganesh Padmanabhan
{"title":"用眼动追踪研究软件需求审查员的阅读模式和学习风格以提高审查员团队的成果","authors":"Anurag Goswami, G. Walia, M. McCourt, Ganesh Padmanabhan","doi":"10.1145/2961111.2962598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background -- Inspecting requirements and design artifacts to find faults saves rework effort significantly. While inspections are effective, their overall team performance rely on inspectors' ability to detect and report faults. Our previous research showed that individual inspectors have varying LSs (i.e., they vary in their ability to process information recorded in requirements document). To extend the results of our previous LS research, this paper utilizes the concept of eye tracking (to record eye movements of inspectors) along with their LSs to detect reading patterns of inspectors during requirements inspections. Aim -- The objective of this research is to analyze the reading trends of effective and efficient inspectors using eye movement and LS data of individual inspectors and virtual inspection teams. Method -- The current research uses data (LS, eye tracking, and inspection) from thirteen inspectors to find its impact on inspection effectiveness and efficiency. Results -- Results from this study show that, inspectors who detect more faults during inspection, focus significantly more at the fault region to find and report faults as opposed to comprehending requirements information. Results also showed Inspection teams with diverse inspectors outperform similar teams and spend more time in comprehending information at the fault region. Additionally, results showed that inspectors with SEQ LS significantly tends to focus more at fault locations and are preferred for inspection. Conclusion -- These results can aid the selection of inspectors during the inspection process thus improving software quality","PeriodicalId":208212,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Eye Tracking to Investigate Reading Patterns and Learning Styles of Software Requirement Inspectors to Enhance Inspection Team Outcome\",\"authors\":\"Anurag Goswami, G. Walia, M. McCourt, Ganesh Padmanabhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2961111.2962598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background -- Inspecting requirements and design artifacts to find faults saves rework effort significantly. While inspections are effective, their overall team performance rely on inspectors' ability to detect and report faults. Our previous research showed that individual inspectors have varying LSs (i.e., they vary in their ability to process information recorded in requirements document). To extend the results of our previous LS research, this paper utilizes the concept of eye tracking (to record eye movements of inspectors) along with their LSs to detect reading patterns of inspectors during requirements inspections. Aim -- The objective of this research is to analyze the reading trends of effective and efficient inspectors using eye movement and LS data of individual inspectors and virtual inspection teams. Method -- The current research uses data (LS, eye tracking, and inspection) from thirteen inspectors to find its impact on inspection effectiveness and efficiency. Results -- Results from this study show that, inspectors who detect more faults during inspection, focus significantly more at the fault region to find and report faults as opposed to comprehending requirements information. Results also showed Inspection teams with diverse inspectors outperform similar teams and spend more time in comprehending information at the fault region. Additionally, results showed that inspectors with SEQ LS significantly tends to focus more at fault locations and are preferred for inspection. Conclusion -- These results can aid the selection of inspectors during the inspection process thus improving software quality\",\"PeriodicalId\":208212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景——检查需求和设计工件以发现错误,大大节省了返工工作。虽然检查是有效的,但他们的整体团队绩效依赖于检查人员检测和报告错误的能力。我们之前的研究表明,单个的检查人员具有不同的LSs(即,他们处理需求文档中记录的信息的能力不同)。为了扩展我们之前的LS研究结果,本文利用眼动追踪的概念(记录审查员的眼动)以及他们的LSs来检测审查员在需求审查期间的阅读模式。目的——本研究的目的是利用单个检查员和虚拟检查员团队的眼动和LS数据来分析有效和高效检查员的阅读趋势。方法——目前的研究使用来自13名检查员的数据(LS,眼动追踪和检查)来发现其对检查有效性和效率的影响。结果——本研究的结果表明,在检查过程中检测到更多错误的检查人员,将更多的注意力集中在故障区域,以发现和报告错误,而不是理解需求信息。结果还表明,拥有不同检查员的检查团队比相似的检查团队表现更好,并且花费更多的时间来理解故障区域的信息。此外,结果表明,具有SEQ LS的检查员明显倾向于更多地关注故障位置,并且更倾向于进行检查。结论——这些结果可以帮助在检查过程中选择检查人员,从而提高软件质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Eye Tracking to Investigate Reading Patterns and Learning Styles of Software Requirement Inspectors to Enhance Inspection Team Outcome
Background -- Inspecting requirements and design artifacts to find faults saves rework effort significantly. While inspections are effective, their overall team performance rely on inspectors' ability to detect and report faults. Our previous research showed that individual inspectors have varying LSs (i.e., they vary in their ability to process information recorded in requirements document). To extend the results of our previous LS research, this paper utilizes the concept of eye tracking (to record eye movements of inspectors) along with their LSs to detect reading patterns of inspectors during requirements inspections. Aim -- The objective of this research is to analyze the reading trends of effective and efficient inspectors using eye movement and LS data of individual inspectors and virtual inspection teams. Method -- The current research uses data (LS, eye tracking, and inspection) from thirteen inspectors to find its impact on inspection effectiveness and efficiency. Results -- Results from this study show that, inspectors who detect more faults during inspection, focus significantly more at the fault region to find and report faults as opposed to comprehending requirements information. Results also showed Inspection teams with diverse inspectors outperform similar teams and spend more time in comprehending information at the fault region. Additionally, results showed that inspectors with SEQ LS significantly tends to focus more at fault locations and are preferred for inspection. Conclusion -- These results can aid the selection of inspectors during the inspection process thus improving software quality
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信