通过数据流比较挖掘建筑元数据

Emil Holmegaard, M. Kjærgaard
{"title":"通过数据流比较挖掘建筑元数据","authors":"Emil Holmegaard, M. Kjærgaard","doi":"10.1109/SUSTECH.2016.7897138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving at scale the energy performance of buildings requires that applications are portable among buildings (i.e. the same application in two different buildings). One challenge in enabling portable applications is metadata about building instrumentation. The problem is that there are multiple ways to annotate sensor and actuation points. This makes it difficult to create intuitive queries for retrieving data streams from points. Another problem is the amount of insufficient or missing metadata. We introduce Metafier, a tool for extracting metadata from comparing data streams. Metafier enables a semi-automatic labeling of metadata to building instrumentation. Metafier annotates points with metadata by comparing the data from a set of validated points with unvalidated points. Metafier has three different algorithms to compare points with based on their data. The three algorithms are Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), and the differential coefficient. Two of the algorithms compare the slope of the data stream in the values. EMD finds similarities based on the frequency bands among the data stream. By using several algorithms the system is robust enough to handle data streams with only slightly similar patterns. We have evaluated Metafier with points and data from one building located in Denmark. We have evaluated Metafier with 903 points, and the overall accuracy, with only 3 known examples, was 94.71%. Furthermore we found that using DTW for mining points with the point type of room temperature achieved an accuracy as high as 98.13%.","PeriodicalId":142240,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining building metadata by data stream comparison\",\"authors\":\"Emil Holmegaard, M. Kjærgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SUSTECH.2016.7897138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving at scale the energy performance of buildings requires that applications are portable among buildings (i.e. the same application in two different buildings). One challenge in enabling portable applications is metadata about building instrumentation. The problem is that there are multiple ways to annotate sensor and actuation points. This makes it difficult to create intuitive queries for retrieving data streams from points. Another problem is the amount of insufficient or missing metadata. We introduce Metafier, a tool for extracting metadata from comparing data streams. Metafier enables a semi-automatic labeling of metadata to building instrumentation. Metafier annotates points with metadata by comparing the data from a set of validated points with unvalidated points. Metafier has three different algorithms to compare points with based on their data. The three algorithms are Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), and the differential coefficient. Two of the algorithms compare the slope of the data stream in the values. EMD finds similarities based on the frequency bands among the data stream. By using several algorithms the system is robust enough to handle data streams with only slightly similar patterns. We have evaluated Metafier with points and data from one building located in Denmark. We have evaluated Metafier with 903 points, and the overall accuracy, with only 3 known examples, was 94.71%. Furthermore we found that using DTW for mining points with the point type of room temperature achieved an accuracy as high as 98.13%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SUSTECH.2016.7897138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SUSTECH.2016.7897138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

大规模提高建筑物的能源性能要求应用程序在建筑物之间是可移植的(即在两个不同的建筑物中使用相同的应用程序)。实现可移植应用程序的一个挑战是关于构建工具的元数据。问题是有多种方法来标注传感器和致动点。这使得很难为从点检索数据流创建直观的查询。另一个问题是元数据的数量不足或缺失。我们介绍Metafier,一个从比较数据流中提取元数据的工具。Metafier支持对元数据进行半自动标记,以构建工具。Metafier通过比较一组经过验证的点与未经验证的点的数据,用元数据对点进行注释。Metafier有三种不同的算法来比较基于他们数据的点。这三种算法分别是动态时间翘曲(DTW)、经验模态分解(EMD)和微分系数。两种算法在值中比较数据流的斜率。EMD根据数据流之间的频带找到相似之处。通过使用几种算法,系统足够健壮,可以处理只有稍微相似模式的数据流。我们用丹麦一栋建筑的点和数据对Metafier进行了评估。我们对Metafier进行了903分的评估,在仅有3个已知示例的情况下,总体准确率为94.71%。此外,我们发现使用DTW对室温点类型的点进行开采,精度高达98.13%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mining building metadata by data stream comparison
Improving at scale the energy performance of buildings requires that applications are portable among buildings (i.e. the same application in two different buildings). One challenge in enabling portable applications is metadata about building instrumentation. The problem is that there are multiple ways to annotate sensor and actuation points. This makes it difficult to create intuitive queries for retrieving data streams from points. Another problem is the amount of insufficient or missing metadata. We introduce Metafier, a tool for extracting metadata from comparing data streams. Metafier enables a semi-automatic labeling of metadata to building instrumentation. Metafier annotates points with metadata by comparing the data from a set of validated points with unvalidated points. Metafier has three different algorithms to compare points with based on their data. The three algorithms are Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), and the differential coefficient. Two of the algorithms compare the slope of the data stream in the values. EMD finds similarities based on the frequency bands among the data stream. By using several algorithms the system is robust enough to handle data streams with only slightly similar patterns. We have evaluated Metafier with points and data from one building located in Denmark. We have evaluated Metafier with 903 points, and the overall accuracy, with only 3 known examples, was 94.71%. Furthermore we found that using DTW for mining points with the point type of room temperature achieved an accuracy as high as 98.13%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信