基于吉尔斯·德勒斯的根茎理论对阿里·巴巴查希和夏姆斯·朗格鲁地一首诗的比较研究

B. Khajat
{"title":"基于吉尔斯·德勒斯的根茎理论对阿里·巴巴查希和夏姆斯·朗格鲁地一首诗的比较研究","authors":"B. Khajat","doi":"10.52547/qap.22439.4.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Gilles Deleuse is a contemporary thinker whose rhizomatological theory (which is opposed to tree theory) has always been considered by thinkers. Deleuse and Flex Guattari, as two post-structuralist philosophers, collaborated with each other for many years and developed this theory in different ways. However, Deleuse's range of opinions is broad and related to various topics. According to this theory (which is based on epistemic and different artisticsystems can be generalized) the notions focused on the integrated, single-root, and center-oriented integrity are reviewed and replaced by a nonlinear, experiential, fluid, and multiplicative context. On the other hand, in the postmodernist poetry of Iran from the early Seventies Solar year has been existed; these approaches and challenges from both the poets' experiences and the theoretical debates and the poetry of the poetry of the era are tangible and expansive, and thus can be used to better understand the postmodernist poetry's identity against traditional and even modern poetry. In this paper, while describing Deleuse's ideas about the rhizomatic approach versus the tree, two poems of these two forms of thought and literature in today's poetry have been adapted and the most important differences between the two methods are classified according to the ten categories to be explained. Ali Babachahi, a representative of the postmodern poetry, and Shams Langroudi, a representative of the so-called \"simplification\" approach, have been chosen by the author to explain this situation because of their reputation, glory, numerous works, and literary rhyme and meter.","PeriodicalId":152014,"journal":{"name":"Critique, analysis and aesthetics of texts","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of a poem by Ali Babachahi and Shams Langroudi on the\\n basis of Gilles DeLeuse’s Rhizomatic theory\",\"authors\":\"B. Khajat\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/qap.22439.4.4.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Gilles Deleuse is a contemporary thinker whose rhizomatological theory (which is opposed to tree theory) has always been considered by thinkers. Deleuse and Flex Guattari, as two post-structuralist philosophers, collaborated with each other for many years and developed this theory in different ways. However, Deleuse's range of opinions is broad and related to various topics. According to this theory (which is based on epistemic and different artisticsystems can be generalized) the notions focused on the integrated, single-root, and center-oriented integrity are reviewed and replaced by a nonlinear, experiential, fluid, and multiplicative context. On the other hand, in the postmodernist poetry of Iran from the early Seventies Solar year has been existed; these approaches and challenges from both the poets' experiences and the theoretical debates and the poetry of the poetry of the era are tangible and expansive, and thus can be used to better understand the postmodernist poetry's identity against traditional and even modern poetry. In this paper, while describing Deleuse's ideas about the rhizomatic approach versus the tree, two poems of these two forms of thought and literature in today's poetry have been adapted and the most important differences between the two methods are classified according to the ten categories to be explained. Ali Babachahi, a representative of the postmodern poetry, and Shams Langroudi, a representative of the so-called \\\"simplification\\\" approach, have been chosen by the author to explain this situation because of their reputation, glory, numerous works, and literary rhyme and meter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critique, analysis and aesthetics of texts\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critique, analysis and aesthetics of texts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/qap.22439.4.4.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critique, analysis and aesthetics of texts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/qap.22439.4.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Gilles Deleuse是当代思想家,他的根茎学理论(与树形理论相对立)一直被思想家们所思考。Deleuse和Flex Guattari作为两位后结构主义哲学家,彼此合作多年,并以不同的方式发展了这一理论。然而,德勒斯的观点范围很广,涉及各种主题。根据这一理论(基于认识论和不同的艺术系统可以普遍化),集中于综合的、单根的和以中心为导向的完整性的概念被重新审视,并被非线性的、经验的、流动的和乘法的语境所取代。另一方面,在伊朗70年代初的后现代主义诗歌中,太阳年一直存在;这些既来自诗人的亲身经历,也来自理论的争论,来自时代诗歌的诗歌,都具有具象性和扩张性,可以用来更好地理解后现代主义诗歌与传统乃至现代诗歌的身份认同。本文在描述德勒兹关于根茎法与树法的观点的同时,对这两种思想和文学形式的两首诗进行了改编,并根据要解释的十大类别对两种方法之间最重要的区别进行了分类。后现代主义诗歌的代表人物阿里·巴巴查希和所谓“简化”派的代表人物沙姆斯·朗格鲁地,因为他们的名声、荣耀、作品众多,以及文学的韵律和韵律,笔者选择了他们来解释这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of a poem by Ali Babachahi and Shams Langroudi on the basis of Gilles DeLeuse’s Rhizomatic theory
: Gilles Deleuse is a contemporary thinker whose rhizomatological theory (which is opposed to tree theory) has always been considered by thinkers. Deleuse and Flex Guattari, as two post-structuralist philosophers, collaborated with each other for many years and developed this theory in different ways. However, Deleuse's range of opinions is broad and related to various topics. According to this theory (which is based on epistemic and different artisticsystems can be generalized) the notions focused on the integrated, single-root, and center-oriented integrity are reviewed and replaced by a nonlinear, experiential, fluid, and multiplicative context. On the other hand, in the postmodernist poetry of Iran from the early Seventies Solar year has been existed; these approaches and challenges from both the poets' experiences and the theoretical debates and the poetry of the poetry of the era are tangible and expansive, and thus can be used to better understand the postmodernist poetry's identity against traditional and even modern poetry. In this paper, while describing Deleuse's ideas about the rhizomatic approach versus the tree, two poems of these two forms of thought and literature in today's poetry have been adapted and the most important differences between the two methods are classified according to the ten categories to be explained. Ali Babachahi, a representative of the postmodern poetry, and Shams Langroudi, a representative of the so-called "simplification" approach, have been chosen by the author to explain this situation because of their reputation, glory, numerous works, and literary rhyme and meter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信