×86计算机体系结构模拟器:比较研究

Ayaz Akram, L. Sawalha
{"title":"×86计算机体系结构模拟器:比较研究","authors":"Ayaz Akram, L. Sawalha","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of computer architecture simulators in advancing computer architecture research is widely acknowledged. Computer architects have developed numerous simulators in the past few decades and their number continues to rise. This paper explores different simulation techniques and surveys many ×86 simulators. Comparing simulators with each other and validating their correctness has been a challenging task. In this paper, we compare and contrast ×86 simulators in terms of flexibility, level of details, user friendliness and simulation models. In addition, we measure the experimental error and compare the speed of four contemporary ×86 simulators: gem5, Multi2sim, PTLsim and Sniper. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of these simulators. We believe that this paper provides insights into different simulation strategies and aims to help computer architects understand the differences among existing simulation tools.","PeriodicalId":297899,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"×86 computer architecture simulators: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Ayaz Akram, L. Sawalha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The significance of computer architecture simulators in advancing computer architecture research is widely acknowledged. Computer architects have developed numerous simulators in the past few decades and their number continues to rise. This paper explores different simulation techniques and surveys many ×86 simulators. Comparing simulators with each other and validating their correctness has been a challenging task. In this paper, we compare and contrast ×86 simulators in terms of flexibility, level of details, user friendliness and simulation models. In addition, we measure the experimental error and compare the speed of four contemporary ×86 simulators: gem5, Multi2sim, PTLsim and Sniper. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of these simulators. We believe that this paper provides insights into different simulation strategies and aims to help computer architects understand the differences among existing simulation tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 34th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2016.7753351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

计算机体系结构模拟器对推进计算机体系结构研究的重要意义已得到广泛认可。在过去的几十年里,计算机架构师已经开发了大量的模拟器,而且它们的数量还在不断增加。本文探讨了不同的仿真技术,并调查了许多×86仿真器。相互比较仿真器并验证其正确性一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。在本文中,我们在灵活性,细节水平,用户友好性和仿真模型方面比较和对比×86模拟器。此外,我们测量了实验误差,并比较了四个当代×86模拟器:gem5, Multi2sim, PTLsim和Sniper的速度。我们还讨论了这些模拟器的优点和局限性。我们相信本文提供了对不同仿真策略的见解,旨在帮助计算机架构师理解现有仿真工具之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
×86 computer architecture simulators: A comparative study
The significance of computer architecture simulators in advancing computer architecture research is widely acknowledged. Computer architects have developed numerous simulators in the past few decades and their number continues to rise. This paper explores different simulation techniques and surveys many ×86 simulators. Comparing simulators with each other and validating their correctness has been a challenging task. In this paper, we compare and contrast ×86 simulators in terms of flexibility, level of details, user friendliness and simulation models. In addition, we measure the experimental error and compare the speed of four contemporary ×86 simulators: gem5, Multi2sim, PTLsim and Sniper. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of these simulators. We believe that this paper provides insights into different simulation strategies and aims to help computer architects understand the differences among existing simulation tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信