Github市场上PHP自动代码检查工具分析

Iderli Pereira de Souza Filho, Lucas Campello, Elder Rodrigues, Gilleanes Thorwald Araujo Guedes, Maicon Bernardino
{"title":"Github市场上PHP自动代码检查工具分析","authors":"Iderli Pereira de Souza Filho, Lucas Campello, Elder Rodrigues, Gilleanes Thorwald Araujo Guedes, Maicon Bernardino","doi":"10.1145/3482909.3482912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code Inspection is a validation process widely used to improve the quality of software. To streamline this process and decrease the possibility of human error, improving the reliability of inspection results, it is possible to use specialized automated code inspection tools. Thus, this article proposes to analyze code inspection tools for PHP programming language, freely available on Github Marketplace. To achieve this goal, the GLPI system was chosen to be inspected, in addition, four code inspection tools were selected, out of twenty-eight available. Criteria were used for the tools selection, consistent with the sytem profile to be inspected and that do not have limitations on the inspection result. To classify the results obtained, the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) was used, a list of software and hardware weaknesses developed by numerous renowned companies, such as Microsoft, Apple and IBM. As a result of the inspection work, we found more than ten thousand failures divided into thirty-four different CWEs and from these we analyzed the individual feedback of each tool, as each one of them had unique advantages and disadvantages.","PeriodicalId":355243,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Automated Code Inspection Tools for PHP Available on Github Marketplace\",\"authors\":\"Iderli Pereira de Souza Filho, Lucas Campello, Elder Rodrigues, Gilleanes Thorwald Araujo Guedes, Maicon Bernardino\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3482909.3482912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code Inspection is a validation process widely used to improve the quality of software. To streamline this process and decrease the possibility of human error, improving the reliability of inspection results, it is possible to use specialized automated code inspection tools. Thus, this article proposes to analyze code inspection tools for PHP programming language, freely available on Github Marketplace. To achieve this goal, the GLPI system was chosen to be inspected, in addition, four code inspection tools were selected, out of twenty-eight available. Criteria were used for the tools selection, consistent with the sytem profile to be inspected and that do not have limitations on the inspection result. To classify the results obtained, the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) was used, a list of software and hardware weaknesses developed by numerous renowned companies, such as Microsoft, Apple and IBM. As a result of the inspection work, we found more than ten thousand failures divided into thirty-four different CWEs and from these we analyzed the individual feedback of each tool, as each one of them had unique advantages and disadvantages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3482909.3482912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3482909.3482912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

代码检查是一种广泛用于提高软件质量的验证过程。为了简化这个过程,减少人为错误的可能性,提高检查结果的可靠性,可以使用专门的自动化代码检查工具。因此,本文建议分析PHP编程语言的代码检查工具,Github Marketplace上免费提供。为了实现这一目标,选择了GLPI系统进行检查,此外,从28个可用的代码检查工具中选择了4个。工具的选择标准与被检查的系统概况一致,并且对检查结果没有限制。为了对获得的结果进行分类,使用了通用弱点枚举(CWE),这是一份由众多知名公司(如微软、苹果和IBM)开发的软件和硬件弱点列表。检查工作的结果是,我们发现了超过10,000个故障,分为34个不同的CWEs,我们从这些故障中分析了每个工具的单独反馈,因为每个工具都有独特的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Analysis of Automated Code Inspection Tools for PHP Available on Github Marketplace
Code Inspection is a validation process widely used to improve the quality of software. To streamline this process and decrease the possibility of human error, improving the reliability of inspection results, it is possible to use specialized automated code inspection tools. Thus, this article proposes to analyze code inspection tools for PHP programming language, freely available on Github Marketplace. To achieve this goal, the GLPI system was chosen to be inspected, in addition, four code inspection tools were selected, out of twenty-eight available. Criteria were used for the tools selection, consistent with the sytem profile to be inspected and that do not have limitations on the inspection result. To classify the results obtained, the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) was used, a list of software and hardware weaknesses developed by numerous renowned companies, such as Microsoft, Apple and IBM. As a result of the inspection work, we found more than ten thousand failures divided into thirty-four different CWEs and from these we analyzed the individual feedback of each tool, as each one of them had unique advantages and disadvantages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信