将专家系统开发过程映射到国防部生命周期模型

A.F.U. Khan
{"title":"将专家系统开发过程映射到国防部生命周期模型","authors":"A.F.U. Khan","doi":"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author reports on the results of a study performed by a team from RAND Corp. and the 7th Communications Group (USAF) for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Production and Logistics. The study guides managers and technicians seeking expert systems (ES) solutions. It is noted that, as ES developments are software engineering efforts, the lessons learned building software over the past decades still apply. DoD software engineering and life-cycle policies can be applied to ES developments. The practical methodology elaborated in the study maps the rapid prototyping paradigm to DoD standards using the spiral model and risk containment strategies as described by B.W. Boehm. Furthermore, software life-cycle management and documentation standards reflect a hardware bias which also affects conventional software developments. Other peculiarities of ES developments are not totally unique to expert systems, either. Modern conventional software developments arc experiencing many of the same problems. Hence, it is concluded that the standards and acquisition practices of yesterday need to evolve to accommodate the nature of software development in the 1990s and beyond.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":232478,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the expert systems development process to the Department of Defense life-cycle model\",\"authors\":\"A.F.U. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MESPP.1990.122673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author reports on the results of a study performed by a team from RAND Corp. and the 7th Communications Group (USAF) for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Production and Logistics. The study guides managers and technicians seeking expert systems (ES) solutions. It is noted that, as ES developments are software engineering efforts, the lessons learned building software over the past decades still apply. DoD software engineering and life-cycle policies can be applied to ES developments. The practical methodology elaborated in the study maps the rapid prototyping paradigm to DoD standards using the spiral model and risk containment strategies as described by B.W. Boehm. Furthermore, software life-cycle management and documentation standards reflect a hardware bias which also affects conventional software developments. Other peculiarities of ES developments are not totally unique to expert systems, either. Modern conventional software developments arc experiencing many of the same problems. Hence, it is concluded that the standards and acquisition practices of yesterday need to evolve to accommodate the nature of software development in the 1990s and beyond.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":232478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings [1990] IEEE Conference on Managing Expert System Programs and Projects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MESPP.1990.122673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

作者报告了兰德公司和第七通信小组(USAF)为负责生产和后勤的助理国防部长办公室进行的一项研究的结果。该研究指导管理人员和技术人员寻求专家系统(ES)解决方案。值得注意的是,由于ES开发是软件工程工作,过去几十年构建软件的经验教训仍然适用。国防部软件工程和生命周期策略可以应用于ES开发。研究中详细阐述的实用方法使用B.W. Boehm描述的螺旋模型和风险控制策略,将快速原型范例映射到国防部标准。此外,软件生命周期管理和文档标准反映了硬件偏差,这也影响了传统的软件开发。ES开发的其他特性也不完全是专家系统所独有的。现代传统软件开发正经历着许多相同的问题。因此,可以得出结论,昨天的标准和获取实践需要发展以适应20世纪90年代及以后的软件开发的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the expert systems development process to the Department of Defense life-cycle model
The author reports on the results of a study performed by a team from RAND Corp. and the 7th Communications Group (USAF) for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Production and Logistics. The study guides managers and technicians seeking expert systems (ES) solutions. It is noted that, as ES developments are software engineering efforts, the lessons learned building software over the past decades still apply. DoD software engineering and life-cycle policies can be applied to ES developments. The practical methodology elaborated in the study maps the rapid prototyping paradigm to DoD standards using the spiral model and risk containment strategies as described by B.W. Boehm. Furthermore, software life-cycle management and documentation standards reflect a hardware bias which also affects conventional software developments. Other peculiarities of ES developments are not totally unique to expert systems, either. Modern conventional software developments arc experiencing many of the same problems. Hence, it is concluded that the standards and acquisition practices of yesterday need to evolve to accommodate the nature of software development in the 1990s and beyond.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信