在选择场外响应措施时使用风险评估

B. Goldman
{"title":"在选择场外响应措施时使用风险评估","authors":"B. Goldman","doi":"10.1089/HWM.1986.3.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper addresses the need for incorporating risk assessment procedures into the decision making for off-site response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or \"Superfund\") and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Differences in regulatory approaches of the CERCLA and RCRA programs as well as inherent deficiencies in implementation of RCRA have led to problems from past off-site responses. EPA's 1985 \"Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-Site Response Actions\" do not provide for adequate risk assessment practices to overcome these historical deficiences. EPA can act as a role model for industry and engender public support by selecting the best off-site facilities. Developing guidance under CERCLA and RCRA addresses the need for risk assessments in the regulation of hazardous waste. The so-called Off-Site Policy should articulate a strategy for use of risk assessment during implementation of off-site response...","PeriodicalId":386820,"journal":{"name":"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of risk assessment during selection of off-site response actions\",\"authors\":\"B. Goldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/HWM.1986.3.205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper addresses the need for incorporating risk assessment procedures into the decision making for off-site response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or \\\"Superfund\\\") and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Differences in regulatory approaches of the CERCLA and RCRA programs as well as inherent deficiencies in implementation of RCRA have led to problems from past off-site responses. EPA's 1985 \\\"Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-Site Response Actions\\\" do not provide for adequate risk assessment practices to overcome these historical deficiences. EPA can act as a role model for industry and engender public support by selecting the best off-site facilities. Developing guidance under CERCLA and RCRA addresses the need for risk assessments in the regulation of hazardous waste. The so-called Off-Site Policy should articulate a strategy for use of risk assessment during implementation of off-site response...\",\"PeriodicalId\":386820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/HWM.1986.3.205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hazardous waste and hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/HWM.1986.3.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文探讨了在1980年《综合环境响应、赔偿和责任法案》(CERCLA或“超级基金”)和《资源保护和恢复法案》(RCRA)下,将风险评估程序纳入场外响应行动决策的必要性。CERCLA和RCRA项目监管方法的差异以及RCRA实施的内在缺陷导致了过去场外响应的问题。EPA 1985年的“计划和实施场外响应行动的程序”没有提供足够的风险评估实践来克服这些历史缺陷。环境保护局可以作为工业界的榜样,通过选择最佳的场外设施获得公众的支持。根据《CERCLA》和《RCRA》制定指导方针,以解决危险废物管理中风险评估的需要。所谓的场外政策应阐明在实施场外响应期间使用风险评估的策略……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of risk assessment during selection of off-site response actions
ABSTRACT This paper addresses the need for incorporating risk assessment procedures into the decision making for off-site response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or "Superfund") and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Differences in regulatory approaches of the CERCLA and RCRA programs as well as inherent deficiencies in implementation of RCRA have led to problems from past off-site responses. EPA's 1985 "Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-Site Response Actions" do not provide for adequate risk assessment practices to overcome these historical deficiences. EPA can act as a role model for industry and engender public support by selecting the best off-site facilities. Developing guidance under CERCLA and RCRA addresses the need for risk assessments in the regulation of hazardous waste. The so-called Off-Site Policy should articulate a strategy for use of risk assessment during implementation of off-site response...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信