脱轨算法的比较分析

2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS) Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034929

Radu Grigoraş, I. Ciocoiu

{"title":"脱轨算法的比较分析","authors":"Radu Grigoraş, I. Ciocoiu","doi":"10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reports comparative performances of five distinct algorithms used for rain removal from single images. Both synthetic and real images are considered, while taking into account standard figures of merit such as PSNR, VIF and SSIM. The experiments revealed that the Gaussian Mixture Model based approach yields best performances in terms of visual quality.","PeriodicalId":338255,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)","volume":"241 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of deraining algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Radu Grigoraş, I. Ciocoiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper reports comparative performances of five distinct algorithms used for rain removal from single images. Both synthetic and real images are considered, while taking into account standard figures of merit such as PSNR, VIF and SSIM. The experiments revealed that the Gaussian Mixture Model based approach yields best performances in terms of visual quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)\",\"volume\":\"241 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇论文报告了从单个图像中去除雨水的五种不同算法的比较性能。合成图像和真实图像都被考虑在内，同时考虑到诸如PSNR、VIF和SSIM等标准指标。实验表明，基于高斯混合模型的方法在视觉质量方面表现最好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparative analysis of deraining algorithms

The paper reports comparative performances of five distinct algorithms used for rain removal from single images. Both synthetic and real images are considered, while taking into account standard figures of merit such as PSNR, VIF and SSIM. The experiments revealed that the Gaussian Mixture Model based approach yields best performances in terms of visual quality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)

自引率

0.00%

发文量