基于效用理论的企业架构评估

Magnus Österlind, Pontus Johnson, K. Karnati, Robert Lagerström, Margus Välja
{"title":"基于效用理论的企业架构评估","authors":"Magnus Österlind, Pontus Johnson, K. Karnati, Robert Lagerström, Margus Välja","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2013.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase in the number of quality attributes (e.g. cost, availability, reusability), that are being considered in the process of enterprise architecture analysis, the decision maker needs a systematic way to balance these attributes against each other to obtain the best possible architecture. Utility theory addresses this need by providing methods for numerical representation of preferences of a stakeholder involved in a decision-making process. In this paper utility theory key concepts are explained with examples. The process of calculating the utility metric, which reflects stake holder's set of preferences to select the most preferred architecture scenario is explained. The paper provides an explanation of how utility theory can be applied in enterprise architecture models which are meta-object facility compliant. This paper concludes by an example comparing two quality attributes on two architecture scenarios using utility theory and calculating the decision maker's overall utility metric across both quality attributes is provided. This shows the applicability of utility theory on architecture scenario analysis with multiple quality attributes.","PeriodicalId":376599,"journal":{"name":"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","volume":"292 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enterprise Architecture Evaluation Using Utility Theory\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Österlind, Pontus Johnson, K. Karnati, Robert Lagerström, Margus Välja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOCW.2013.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increase in the number of quality attributes (e.g. cost, availability, reusability), that are being considered in the process of enterprise architecture analysis, the decision maker needs a systematic way to balance these attributes against each other to obtain the best possible architecture. Utility theory addresses this need by providing methods for numerical representation of preferences of a stakeholder involved in a decision-making process. In this paper utility theory key concepts are explained with examples. The process of calculating the utility metric, which reflects stake holder's set of preferences to select the most preferred architecture scenario is explained. The paper provides an explanation of how utility theory can be applied in enterprise architecture models which are meta-object facility compliant. This paper concludes by an example comparing two quality attributes on two architecture scenarios using utility theory and calculating the decision maker's overall utility metric across both quality attributes is provided. This shows the applicability of utility theory on architecture scenario analysis with multiple quality attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"volume\":\"292 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2013.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2013.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

随着企业架构分析过程中所考虑的质量属性(例如成本、可用性、可重用性)数量的增加,决策者需要一种系统的方法来平衡这些属性,以获得最好的架构。效用理论通过提供参与决策过程的利益相关者偏好的数值表示方法来解决这一需求。本文通过实例对效用理论的关键概念进行了解释。解释了计算效用度量的过程,它反映了涉众选择最喜欢的体系结构场景的偏好集。本文解释了效用理论如何应用于元对象设施兼容的企业架构模型。本文最后通过一个例子,利用效用理论比较了两种体系结构场景下的两个质量属性,并计算了决策者在两个质量属性上的总体效用度量。这表明效用理论在具有多重质量属性的建筑场景分析中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enterprise Architecture Evaluation Using Utility Theory
With the increase in the number of quality attributes (e.g. cost, availability, reusability), that are being considered in the process of enterprise architecture analysis, the decision maker needs a systematic way to balance these attributes against each other to obtain the best possible architecture. Utility theory addresses this need by providing methods for numerical representation of preferences of a stakeholder involved in a decision-making process. In this paper utility theory key concepts are explained with examples. The process of calculating the utility metric, which reflects stake holder's set of preferences to select the most preferred architecture scenario is explained. The paper provides an explanation of how utility theory can be applied in enterprise architecture models which are meta-object facility compliant. This paper concludes by an example comparing two quality attributes on two architecture scenarios using utility theory and calculating the decision maker's overall utility metric across both quality attributes is provided. This shows the applicability of utility theory on architecture scenario analysis with multiple quality attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信