气候变化法中的生物多样性补偿和栖息地银行——一个MBI的(Coase)效率

SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic) Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1992962

Cheryl Micallef-Borg

{"title":"气候变化法中的生物多样性补偿和栖息地银行——一个MBI的(Coase)效率","authors":"Cheryl Micallef-Borg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1992962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employing a regulatory structure analysis and a ‘law and economics’ investigation, this study seeks to determine the potential use of a nature conservation market based regulatory instrument in climate change law, on all regulatory planes i.e. national, European (regional), and International. Economic (Coase) efficiency will enable the formulation of a theory that Bio/Habitat Offsets and Banking can effectively co-exist and enhance the current status quo in climate change regulatory regimes.","PeriodicalId":367866,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity Offsets & Habitat Banking in Climate Change Law - An MBI's (Coase) Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Micallef-Borg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1992962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employing a regulatory structure analysis and a ‘law and economics’ investigation, this study seeks to determine the potential use of a nature conservation market based regulatory instrument in climate change law, on all regulatory planes i.e. national, European (regional), and International. Economic (Coase) efficiency will enable the formulation of a theory that Bio/Habitat Offsets and Banking can effectively co-exist and enhance the current status quo in climate change regulatory regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用监管结构分析和“法律与经济学”调查，旨在确定在所有监管层面(即国家、欧洲(地区)和国际)，以自然保护市场为基础的监管工具在气候变化法律中的潜在用途。经济(Coase)效率将使生物/生境补偿和银行可以有效共存的理论得以形成，并改善气候变化监管制度的现状。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Biodiversity Offsets & Habitat Banking in Climate Change Law - An MBI's (Coase) Efficiency

Employing a regulatory structure analysis and a ‘law and economics’ investigation, this study seeks to determine the potential use of a nature conservation market based regulatory instrument in climate change law, on all regulatory planes i.e. national, European (regional), and International. Economic (Coase) efficiency will enable the formulation of a theory that Bio/Habitat Offsets and Banking can effectively co-exist and enhance the current status quo in climate change regulatory regimes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SRPN: Biotechnology (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量