解读CRAsWatch公告对欧盟主权债券收益率的影响:CRAsWatch监管事前和事后效应的实证检验

E. Samunderu, Nicoletta Layher
{"title":"解读CRAsWatch公告对欧盟主权债券收益率的影响:CRAsWatch监管事前和事后效应的实证检验","authors":"E. Samunderu, Nicoletta Layher","doi":"10.54646/bijomrp.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to analyze whether if, there is a correlation relationship between Credit Rating Agencies’ (CRAs) watch announcements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of CRA II regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the risk associated with in investing in sovereign bonds. . . However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereign bond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Portugal. This country sample represents the empirical analysis of our study. Data used for this analysis includes information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements from Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings and interest rate volatility are all extrapolated from Bloomberg Database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940 until 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regressions tests in order to determine if evidence exists whether there a change in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies before and after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watch announcements. According to the F-test and p-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with ten and five-year maturities shows statistical significance in both situations at a 95% and 99% confidence level.With 0 for all regression analyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":433289,"journal":{"name":"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the Impact of CRAsWatch Announcement on EU Sovereign Bond Yields: Empirical Examination of Ex Ante and Post Ante Effects of the CRAII Regulation\",\"authors\":\"E. Samunderu, Nicoletta Layher\",\"doi\":\"10.54646/bijomrp.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper aims to analyze whether if, there is a correlation relationship between Credit Rating Agencies’ (CRAs) watch announcements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of CRA II regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the risk associated with in investing in sovereign bonds. . . However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereign bond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Portugal. This country sample represents the empirical analysis of our study. Data used for this analysis includes information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements from Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings and interest rate volatility are all extrapolated from Bloomberg Database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940 until 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regressions tests in order to determine if evidence exists whether there a change in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies before and after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watch announcements. According to the F-test and p-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with ten and five-year maturities shows statistical significance in both situations at a 95% and 99% confidence level.With 0 for all regression analyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijomrp.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijomrp.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析信用评级机构对欧盟主权债券收益率的观察公告与CRA II监管实施后欧盟主权债券收益率之间是否存在相关关系。理论上,评级机构的作用是向投资者提供有关投资主权债券风险的关键信息……然而,评级机构是否会影响欧盟主权债券收益率仍不清楚。奥地利、德国、比利时、芬兰、法国、荷兰、爱尔兰、意大利、西班牙和葡萄牙的主权债券收益率被征收。这个国家的样本代表了我们研究的实证分析。本分析使用的数据包括欧洲主权债券收益率、标准普尔金融服务公司、穆迪投资者服务公司和惠誉评级公司的信用观察公告以及利率波动等信息,这些数据都是从彭博数据库推断出来的。欧洲主权债券的收益率是从1940年到2015年收集的。我们的研究进行了多重线性回归检验,以确定是否存在证据表明,在引入CRA II法规之前和之后,三大信用评级机构的观察公告是否决定了收益率的变化,以及评级机构是否通过其观察公告影响收益率。根据f检验和p值结果,对10年期和5年期主权债券的研究在95%和99%的置信水平上都具有统计显著性。所有回归分析均为0,利率波动在统计上也显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking the Impact of CRAsWatch Announcement on EU Sovereign Bond Yields: Empirical Examination of Ex Ante and Post Ante Effects of the CRAII Regulation
The paper aims to analyze whether if, there is a correlation relationship between Credit Rating Agencies’ (CRAs) watch announcements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of CRA II regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the risk associated with in investing in sovereign bonds. . . However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereign bond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Portugal. This country sample represents the empirical analysis of our study. Data used for this analysis includes information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements from Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings and interest rate volatility are all extrapolated from Bloomberg Database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940 until 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regressions tests in order to determine if evidence exists whether there a change in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies before and after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watch announcements. According to the F-test and p-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with ten and five-year maturities shows statistical significance in both situations at a 95% and 99% confidence level.With 0 for all regression analyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信