基于主机的sdn能与基于交换机的sdn的流量工程能力相媲美吗?

Yu Lei, Julian P. Lanson, Remy M. Kaldawy, J. Estrada, Craig A. Shue
{"title":"基于主机的sdn能与基于交换机的sdn的流量工程能力相媲美吗?","authors":"Yu Lei, Julian P. Lanson, Remy M. Kaldawy, J. Estrada, Craig A. Shue","doi":"10.1109/NoF50125.2020.9249110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm offers significant flexibility for network operators. However, the SDN community has focused on switch-based implementations, which pose several challenges. First, some may require significant hardware costs to upgrade a network. Further, fine-grained flow control in a switch-based SDN results in well-known, fundamental scalability limitations. These challenges may limit the reach of SDN technologies. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments.","PeriodicalId":405626,"journal":{"name":"2020 11th International Conference on Network of the Future (NoF)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Host-Based SDNs Rival the Traffic Engineering Abilities of Switch-Based SDNs?\",\"authors\":\"Yu Lei, Julian P. Lanson, Remy M. Kaldawy, J. Estrada, Craig A. Shue\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NoF50125.2020.9249110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm offers significant flexibility for network operators. However, the SDN community has focused on switch-based implementations, which pose several challenges. First, some may require significant hardware costs to upgrade a network. Further, fine-grained flow control in a switch-based SDN results in well-known, fundamental scalability limitations. These challenges may limit the reach of SDN technologies. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 11th International Conference on Network of the Future (NoF)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 11th International Conference on Network of the Future (NoF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NoF50125.2020.9249110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 11th International Conference on Network of the Future (NoF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NoF50125.2020.9249110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)范例为网络运营商提供了极大的灵活性。然而,SDN社区一直专注于基于交换机的实现,这带来了一些挑战。首先,有些可能需要大量的硬件成本来升级网络。此外,基于交换机的SDN中的细粒度流控制会导致众所周知的基本可伸缩性限制。这些挑战可能会限制SDN技术的应用范围。在这项工作中,我们探索了基于主机的SDN代理在多大程度上可以实现与基于交换机的SDN的功能相同。先前的工作已经显示了基于主机的sdn在安全和访问控制方面的潜力。我们的研究发现,通过适当的准备,基于主机的代理在流量工程的剩余关键领域提供与基于交换机的SDN相同的功能,即使在传统的管理交换机网络中也是如此。我们发现该方法提供了与基于交换机的SDN相当的性能,同时消除了基于交换机的SDN部署的流表可扩展性和成本问题。在这项工作中,我们探索了基于主机的SDN代理在多大程度上可以实现与基于交换机的SDN的功能相同。先前的工作已经显示了基于主机的sdn在安全和访问控制方面的潜力。我们的研究发现,通过适当的准备,基于主机的代理在流量工程的剩余关键领域提供与基于交换机的SDN相同的功能,即使在传统的管理交换机网络中也是如此。我们发现该方法提供了与基于交换机的SDN相当的性能,同时消除了基于交换机的SDN部署的流表可扩展性和成本问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Host-Based SDNs Rival the Traffic Engineering Abilities of Switch-Based SDNs?
The software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm offers significant flexibility for network operators. However, the SDN community has focused on switch-based implementations, which pose several challenges. First, some may require significant hardware costs to upgrade a network. Further, fine-grained flow control in a switch-based SDN results in well-known, fundamental scalability limitations. These challenges may limit the reach of SDN technologies. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments. In this work, we explore the extent to which host-based SDN agents can achieve feature parity with switch-based SDNs. Prior work has shown the potential of host-based SDNs for security and access control. Our study finds that with appropriate preparation, a host-based agent offers the same capabilities of switch-based SDN s in the remaining key area of traffic engineering, even in a legacy managed-switch network. We find the approach offers comparable performance to switch-based SDNs while eliminating the flow table scalability and cost concerns of switch-based SDN deployments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信