现实主义者和梦想家

Justin Desautels-Stein
{"title":"现实主义者和梦想家","authors":"Justin Desautels-Stein","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we ask how the concept of sovereignty might become something other than what it has been, we must realise the structural context of the question. If we take liberal legalism as that context, we discover that the concept of sovereignty has a twin in the concept of property. To be sure, when we move beyond the deep grammars of the structure, important conceptual differences quickly emerge. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that if we are to take seriously our concerns with social change and transformation, and ask what concepts like sovereignty and property might become, we must first understand the deeper structural frames from which these concepts take their meaning. Reckoning with the possibilities of sovereign change and transformation is less like altering a small dialect, and more like transforming the syntactical range of an entire language.","PeriodicalId":342974,"journal":{"name":"Contingency in International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Realist and the Visionary\",\"authors\":\"Justin Desautels-Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we ask how the concept of sovereignty might become something other than what it has been, we must realise the structural context of the question. If we take liberal legalism as that context, we discover that the concept of sovereignty has a twin in the concept of property. To be sure, when we move beyond the deep grammars of the structure, important conceptual differences quickly emerge. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that if we are to take seriously our concerns with social change and transformation, and ask what concepts like sovereignty and property might become, we must first understand the deeper structural frames from which these concepts take their meaning. Reckoning with the possibilities of sovereign change and transformation is less like altering a small dialect, and more like transforming the syntactical range of an entire language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contingency in International Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contingency in International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contingency in International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们问主权的概念如何可能改变它过去的样子时,我们必须认识到这个问题的结构背景。如果我们以自由法家主义为背景,我们会发现主权概念在财产概念中有一个孪生兄弟。可以肯定的是,当我们超越结构的深层语法时,重要的概念差异很快就会出现。然而,本章认为,如果我们要认真对待我们对社会变革和转型的关注,并询问主权和财产等概念可能会变成什么,我们必须首先了解这些概念的深层结构框架。考虑主权变化和转换的可能性不像改变一种小方言,而更像是改变整个语言的语法范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Realist and the Visionary
When we ask how the concept of sovereignty might become something other than what it has been, we must realise the structural context of the question. If we take liberal legalism as that context, we discover that the concept of sovereignty has a twin in the concept of property. To be sure, when we move beyond the deep grammars of the structure, important conceptual differences quickly emerge. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that if we are to take seriously our concerns with social change and transformation, and ask what concepts like sovereignty and property might become, we must first understand the deeper structural frames from which these concepts take their meaning. Reckoning with the possibilities of sovereign change and transformation is less like altering a small dialect, and more like transforming the syntactical range of an entire language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信