在医疗服务不足或无法获得医疗服务的国家实施国际保护和不驱回原则

Bojan Stojanović, Bogdan Krasić, Z. Stojanović
{"title":"在医疗服务不足或无法获得医疗服务的国家实施国际保护和不驱回原则","authors":"Bojan Stojanović, Bogdan Krasić, Z. Stojanović","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn1-34595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Coronavirus pandemic has once again exposed the dramatic differences between countries in terms of access to and quality of healthcare. With reference to the context of the Coronavirus pandemic, the authors analyze whether the endangered right to health, as a fundamental human right which is endangered through inadequate or inaccessible healthcare, can be the basis for granting the international protection or applying the principle of non-refoulement. This topic has been insufficiently covered both in legal theory and in legal documents, while the case law on this matter is still in the process of development. The current practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to asylum and health is not uniform, but it is to be expected that relevant case law and changes in the legal framework will ensue in the forthcoming period.","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Protection and application of the Non-refoulement principle in countries with inadequate or inaccessible healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Bojan Stojanović, Bogdan Krasić, Z. Stojanović\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zrpfn1-34595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Coronavirus pandemic has once again exposed the dramatic differences between countries in terms of access to and quality of healthcare. With reference to the context of the Coronavirus pandemic, the authors analyze whether the endangered right to health, as a fundamental human right which is endangered through inadequate or inaccessible healthcare, can be the basis for granting the international protection or applying the principle of non-refoulement. This topic has been insufficiently covered both in legal theory and in legal documents, while the case law on this matter is still in the process of development. The current practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to asylum and health is not uniform, but it is to be expected that relevant case law and changes in the legal framework will ensue in the forthcoming period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-34595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-34595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状病毒大流行再次暴露了各国在获得医疗保健和质量方面的巨大差异。参考冠状病毒大流行的背景,提交人分析了健康权作为一项基本人权是否可以作为给予国际保护或适用不驱回原则的基础,健康权因不充分或无法获得医疗保健而受到威胁。这一问题在法律理论和法律文书中都没有得到充分的阐述,而关于这一问题的判例法还处于发展过程中。欧洲人权法院目前在庇护权和健康权方面的做法并不统一,但预计在今后一段时间内将出台相关的判例法和法律框架的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Protection and application of the Non-refoulement principle in countries with inadequate or inaccessible healthcare
The Coronavirus pandemic has once again exposed the dramatic differences between countries in terms of access to and quality of healthcare. With reference to the context of the Coronavirus pandemic, the authors analyze whether the endangered right to health, as a fundamental human right which is endangered through inadequate or inaccessible healthcare, can be the basis for granting the international protection or applying the principle of non-refoulement. This topic has been insufficiently covered both in legal theory and in legal documents, while the case law on this matter is still in the process of development. The current practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to asylum and health is not uniform, but it is to be expected that relevant case law and changes in the legal framework will ensue in the forthcoming period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信