风能预报的准确性及改进前景

K. Forbes, Ernest M. Zampelli
{"title":"风能预报的准确性及改进前景","authors":"K. Forbes, Ernest M. Zampelli","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wind energy forecast errors, while modest when weighted by wind energy capacity, are quite large relative to the average level of actual wind energy generation. For example, while the capacity weighted root mean squared error (CWRMSE) of day-ahead wind energy forecasts for the 50Hertz control area in Germany over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015 is just 4.5 percent, the energy-weighted root-mean-squared-error (EWRMSE) is almost five times as large at 21.67 percent. Our analysis also indicates that the errors in 50Hertz's wind energy forecasts are statistically related to forecasted weather conditions. Based on this finding and the time-series attributes of the forecast errors, an ARCH/ARMAX model was formulated to predict wind energy generation. The model's forecasting accuracy was evaluated using out-of-sample data over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015. The out-of-sample period-ahead predictions have a EWRMSE of about 2.93 percent and CWRMSE of about 0.60 percent.","PeriodicalId":416082,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of wind energy forecasts and prospects for improvement\",\"authors\":\"K. Forbes, Ernest M. Zampelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wind energy forecast errors, while modest when weighted by wind energy capacity, are quite large relative to the average level of actual wind energy generation. For example, while the capacity weighted root mean squared error (CWRMSE) of day-ahead wind energy forecasts for the 50Hertz control area in Germany over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015 is just 4.5 percent, the energy-weighted root-mean-squared-error (EWRMSE) is almost five times as large at 21.67 percent. Our analysis also indicates that the errors in 50Hertz's wind energy forecasts are statistically related to forecasted weather conditions. Based on this finding and the time-series attributes of the forecast errors, an ARCH/ARMAX model was formulated to predict wind energy generation. The model's forecasting accuracy was evaluated using out-of-sample data over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015. The out-of-sample period-ahead predictions have a EWRMSE of about 2.93 percent and CWRMSE of about 0.60 percent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

风能预测的误差,虽然在风能容量加权时是适度的,但相对于实际风能发电的平均水平来说是相当大的。例如,2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间,德国50赫兹控制区风电预报的容量加权均方根误差(CWRMSE)仅为4.5%,而能量加权均方根误差(EWRMSE)几乎是前者的五倍,为21.67%。我们的分析还表明,50Hertz风能预测的误差在统计上与预测的天气状况有关。在此基础上,结合预测误差的时间序列属性,建立了预测风力发电的ARCH/ARMAX模型。使用2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间的样本外数据对模型的预测精度进行了评估。样本外周期预测的EWRMSE约为2.93%,CWRMSE约为0.60%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The accuracy of wind energy forecasts and prospects for improvement
Wind energy forecast errors, while modest when weighted by wind energy capacity, are quite large relative to the average level of actual wind energy generation. For example, while the capacity weighted root mean squared error (CWRMSE) of day-ahead wind energy forecasts for the 50Hertz control area in Germany over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015 is just 4.5 percent, the energy-weighted root-mean-squared-error (EWRMSE) is almost five times as large at 21.67 percent. Our analysis also indicates that the errors in 50Hertz's wind energy forecasts are statistically related to forecasted weather conditions. Based on this finding and the time-series attributes of the forecast errors, an ARCH/ARMAX model was formulated to predict wind energy generation. The model's forecasting accuracy was evaluated using out-of-sample data over the period 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015. The out-of-sample period-ahead predictions have a EWRMSE of about 2.93 percent and CWRMSE of about 0.60 percent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信