{"title":"保护非洲土著知识和土著医生的权利和利益:法律、领导和治理","authors":"E. Kibuka-Sebitosi","doi":"10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies the rights and interests of indigenous medicine practitioners and analyzes the extent to which they are currently protected in selected countries in Africa.\nUtilizing document analysis and interviews, the findings underscore the challenges and\nurgent need to protect Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and the rights and needs of\nthe practitioners especially in the wake of globalization. The findings revealed an urgent\nneed for intellectual property rights, drafting the legislation and implementing the laws\namong others. The challenge is to keep the question of whether the intellectual property\nrights appropriately apply in the African context. In some countries the practitioners' rights\nare recognized and legislation to protect them has been drafted such as in South Africa.\nIndigenous knowledge as a body of knowledge and some of the practices are characterized\nas mysterious. There appears to be misconceptions about the body of knowledge as\ncompared to modern medicine. The protection of IKS, given its complex nature, required a\nlong consultative process. Ultimately, a continental, multi-sectoral and an Inter-, Transand\nMulti-disciplinary (MIT) approaches might be the most appropriate in the protection of\nthe IKS and the needs and interests of indigenous medical practitioners. Keywords : Indigenous knowledge, indigenous medicine practioners, intellectual\nproperty rights, protection of IKS. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 72-86","PeriodicalId":151323,"journal":{"name":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","volume":"46 8 Pt 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting indigenous knowledge and the rights and interests of indigenous medicine practitioners in Africa : law, leadership and governance\",\"authors\":\"E. Kibuka-Sebitosi\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies the rights and interests of indigenous medicine practitioners and analyzes the extent to which they are currently protected in selected countries in Africa.\\nUtilizing document analysis and interviews, the findings underscore the challenges and\\nurgent need to protect Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and the rights and needs of\\nthe practitioners especially in the wake of globalization. The findings revealed an urgent\\nneed for intellectual property rights, drafting the legislation and implementing the laws\\namong others. The challenge is to keep the question of whether the intellectual property\\nrights appropriately apply in the African context. In some countries the practitioners' rights\\nare recognized and legislation to protect them has been drafted such as in South Africa.\\nIndigenous knowledge as a body of knowledge and some of the practices are characterized\\nas mysterious. There appears to be misconceptions about the body of knowledge as\\ncompared to modern medicine. The protection of IKS, given its complex nature, required a\\nlong consultative process. Ultimately, a continental, multi-sectoral and an Inter-, Transand\\nMulti-disciplinary (MIT) approaches might be the most appropriate in the protection of\\nthe IKS and the needs and interests of indigenous medical practitioners. Keywords : Indigenous knowledge, indigenous medicine practioners, intellectual\\nproperty rights, protection of IKS. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 72-86\",\"PeriodicalId\":151323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"volume\":\"46 8 Pt 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V7I1.26395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
这篇文章确定了土著医学从业者的权利和利益,并分析了他们目前在非洲某些国家受到保护的程度。利用文献分析和访谈,研究结果强调了保护土著知识系统(IKS)的挑战和迫切需要,以及从业者的权利和需求,特别是在全球化之后。调查结果显示,在起草立法和实施法律等方面,迫切需要保护知识产权。挑战在于保持知识产权是否恰当地适用于非洲环境的问题。在一些国家,从业者的权利得到承认,并起草了保护他们的立法,例如在南非。土著知识作为一个知识体系和一些实践具有神秘的特征。与现代医学相比,人们对知识体系似乎存在误解。鉴于其复杂的性质,保护外籍人士需要一个漫长的协商过程。最终,大陆、多部门和跨、跨和多学科(MIT)的方法可能是保护土著医生和土著医生的需求和利益的最合适的方法。关键词:土著知识;土著医生;知识产权;Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 72-86
Protecting indigenous knowledge and the rights and interests of indigenous medicine practitioners in Africa : law, leadership and governance
This article identifies the rights and interests of indigenous medicine practitioners and analyzes the extent to which they are currently protected in selected countries in Africa.
Utilizing document analysis and interviews, the findings underscore the challenges and
urgent need to protect Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and the rights and needs of
the practitioners especially in the wake of globalization. The findings revealed an urgent
need for intellectual property rights, drafting the legislation and implementing the laws
among others. The challenge is to keep the question of whether the intellectual property
rights appropriately apply in the African context. In some countries the practitioners' rights
are recognized and legislation to protect them has been drafted such as in South Africa.
Indigenous knowledge as a body of knowledge and some of the practices are characterized
as mysterious. There appears to be misconceptions about the body of knowledge as
compared to modern medicine. The protection of IKS, given its complex nature, required a
long consultative process. Ultimately, a continental, multi-sectoral and an Inter-, Transand
Multi-disciplinary (MIT) approaches might be the most appropriate in the protection of
the IKS and the needs and interests of indigenous medical practitioners. Keywords : Indigenous knowledge, indigenous medicine practioners, intellectual
property rights, protection of IKS. Indilinga Vol. 7 (1) 2008: pp. 72-86