K. Hasegawa, Yinsheng Li, Yun‐Jae Kim, V. Lacroix, B. Strnadel
{"title":"用组合规则计算带周向双裂纹管道的塑性破坏应力","authors":"K. Hasegawa, Yinsheng Li, Yun‐Jae Kim, V. Lacroix, B. Strnadel","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When discrete multiple flaws are in the same plane, and they are close to each other, it can be determined whether they are combined or standalone in accordance with combination rules provided by fitness-for-service (FFS) codes, such as ASME, JSME, BS7910, FKM, WES2805, etc. However, specific criteria of the rules are different amongst these FFS codes.\n On the other hand, plastic collapse bending stresses for stainless steel pipes with circumferential twin flaws were obtained by experiments and the prediction procedure for collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws were developed analytically. Using the experimental data and the analytical procedure, plastic collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws are compared with the stresses in compliance with the combination criteria. It is shown that the calculated plastic collapse stresses based on the combination criteria are significantly different from the experimental and analytical stresses.","PeriodicalId":128383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plastic Collapse Stresses for Pipes With Circumferential Twin Flaws Using Combination Rules\",\"authors\":\"K. Hasegawa, Yinsheng Li, Yun‐Jae Kim, V. Lacroix, B. Strnadel\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-84019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When discrete multiple flaws are in the same plane, and they are close to each other, it can be determined whether they are combined or standalone in accordance with combination rules provided by fitness-for-service (FFS) codes, such as ASME, JSME, BS7910, FKM, WES2805, etc. However, specific criteria of the rules are different amongst these FFS codes.\\n On the other hand, plastic collapse bending stresses for stainless steel pipes with circumferential twin flaws were obtained by experiments and the prediction procedure for collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws were developed analytically. Using the experimental data and the analytical procedure, plastic collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws are compared with the stresses in compliance with the combination criteria. It is shown that the calculated plastic collapse stresses based on the combination criteria are significantly different from the experimental and analytical stresses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当离散的多个缺陷在同一平面内且彼此靠近时,可根据FFS (fitness- to -service)规范(如ASME、JSME、BS7910、FKM、WES2805等)提供的组合规则判断它们是组合还是独立。但是,这些田间FFS规范的具体标准有所不同。另一方面,通过实验得到了带周向双裂纹的不锈钢管的塑性崩溃弯曲应力,并对带双裂纹的不锈钢管的崩溃应力预测方法进行了分析。利用实验数据和分析方法,将双缺陷管道的塑性破坏应力与符合组合准则的应力进行了比较。计算结果表明,基于组合准则计算的塑性破坏应力与试验和分析应力存在显著差异。
Plastic Collapse Stresses for Pipes With Circumferential Twin Flaws Using Combination Rules
When discrete multiple flaws are in the same plane, and they are close to each other, it can be determined whether they are combined or standalone in accordance with combination rules provided by fitness-for-service (FFS) codes, such as ASME, JSME, BS7910, FKM, WES2805, etc. However, specific criteria of the rules are different amongst these FFS codes.
On the other hand, plastic collapse bending stresses for stainless steel pipes with circumferential twin flaws were obtained by experiments and the prediction procedure for collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws were developed analytically. Using the experimental data and the analytical procedure, plastic collapse stresses for pipes with twin flaws are compared with the stresses in compliance with the combination criteria. It is shown that the calculated plastic collapse stresses based on the combination criteria are significantly different from the experimental and analytical stresses.