信息隐私、解释权和可解释的人工智能

2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC) Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.1109/PAC.2018.00013

Tae Wan Kim, Bryan R. Routledge

{"title":"信息隐私、解释权和可解释的人工智能","authors":"Tae Wan Kim, Bryan R. Routledge","doi":"10.1109/PAC.2018.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Businesses increasingly utilize secret algorithms and infringe users' informational privacy. We argue that to best protect users' online privacy, the use of an algorithm that assists with decisions or autonomously makes decisions that impact people requires a right to explanation.","PeriodicalId":208309,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informational Privacy, A Right to Explanation, and Interpretable AI\",\"authors\":\"Tae Wan Kim, Bryan R. Routledge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PAC.2018.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Businesses increasingly utilize secret algorithms and infringe users' informational privacy. We argue that to best protect users' online privacy, the use of an algorithm that assists with decisions or autonomously makes decisions that impact people requires a right to explanation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PAC.2018.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PAC.2018.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 20

摘要

企业越来越多地使用秘密算法，侵犯用户的信息隐私。我们认为，为了最好地保护用户的在线隐私，使用辅助决策或自主做出影响人们的决策的算法需要解释权。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Informational Privacy, A Right to Explanation, and Interpretable AI

Businesses increasingly utilize secret algorithms and infringe users' informational privacy. We argue that to best protect users' online privacy, the use of an algorithm that assists with decisions or autonomously makes decisions that impact people requires a right to explanation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2018 IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量