马厩式合作学习模式和NHT对学生活动和学习结果的类型

Maria Eflinda Suryati Lindung
{"title":"马厩式合作学习模式和NHT对学生活动和学习结果的类型","authors":"Maria Eflinda Suryati Lindung","doi":"10.55719/jrpm.v3i1.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the application of the cooperative learning model type STAD and type NHT on student activity and learning outcomes. This study uses a quantitative approach and the method used is an experimental method with data collection techniques using test and observation methods. The statistical test used was the multi-variate analysis of variance test. The result of this research is that there is a significant difference between the STAD and NHT cooperative learning models on student learning outcomes and activities.","PeriodicalId":269844,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TIPE NHT TERHADAP KEAKTIFAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA\",\"authors\":\"Maria Eflinda Suryati Lindung\",\"doi\":\"10.55719/jrpm.v3i1.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the application of the cooperative learning model type STAD and type NHT on student activity and learning outcomes. This study uses a quantitative approach and the method used is an experimental method with data collection techniques using test and observation methods. The statistical test used was the multi-variate analysis of variance test. The result of this research is that there is a significant difference between the STAD and NHT cooperative learning models on student learning outcomes and activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55719/jrpm.v3i1.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55719/jrpm.v3i1.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定STAD和NHT合作学习模式的应用对学生活动和学习成果的影响是否存在差异。本研究采用定量方法,使用的方法是实验方法,采用试验和观察方法收集数据。采用的统计检验为多变量方差分析检验。本研究的结果是,STAD和NHT合作学习模式在学生学习成果和活动方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TIPE NHT TERHADAP KEAKTIFAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the application of the cooperative learning model type STAD and type NHT on student activity and learning outcomes. This study uses a quantitative approach and the method used is an experimental method with data collection techniques using test and observation methods. The statistical test used was the multi-variate analysis of variance test. The result of this research is that there is a significant difference between the STAD and NHT cooperative learning models on student learning outcomes and activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信