评估综合测量和评价策略:一个案例研究

L. Olsina, M. Papa, Pablo Becker
{"title":"评估综合测量和评价策略:一个案例研究","authors":"L. Olsina, M. Papa, Pablo Becker","doi":"10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a case study aimed at understanding and comparing integrated strategies for software measurement and evaluation, considering a strategy as a resource from the assessed entity standpoint. The evaluation focus is on the quality of the capabilities of a measurement and evaluation strategy taking into account three key aspects: i) the conceptual framework, centered on a terminological base, ii) the explicit specification of the process, and iii) the methodological/technological support. We consider a strategy is integrated if to great extent these three capabilities are met simultaneously. In the illustrated case study two strategies i.e. GQM+Strategies (Goal-Question-Metric), and GOCAME (Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Measurement and Evaluation) are evaluated. The given results allowed us the understanding of strengths and weaknesses for both strategies, and planning improvement actions as well.","PeriodicalId":131009,"journal":{"name":"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing integrated measurement and evaluation strategies: A case study\",\"authors\":\"L. Olsina, M. Papa, Pablo Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a case study aimed at understanding and comparing integrated strategies for software measurement and evaluation, considering a strategy as a resource from the assessed entity standpoint. The evaluation focus is on the quality of the capabilities of a measurement and evaluation strategy taking into account three key aspects: i) the conceptual framework, centered on a terminological base, ii) the explicit specification of the process, and iii) the methodological/technological support. We consider a strategy is integrated if to great extent these three capabilities are met simultaneously. In the illustrated case study two strategies i.e. GQM+Strategies (Goal-Question-Metric), and GOCAME (Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Measurement and Evaluation) are evaluated. The given results allowed us the understanding of strengths and weaknesses for both strategies, and planning improvement actions as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出了一个案例研究,旨在理解和比较软件度量和评估的集成策略,从被评估实体的角度考虑策略作为资源。评估的重点是考虑到三个关键方面的测量和评估策略的能力质量:1)以术语基础为中心的概念框架,2)过程的明确规范,以及3)方法/技术支持。如果在很大程度上同时满足这三种能力,我们认为一个战略是完整的。在案例研究中,对GQM+策略(目标-问题-度量)和gocome(目标导向的上下文感知测量和评估)两种策略进行了评估。给定的结果使我们能够理解这两种策略的优势和劣势,并计划改进行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing integrated measurement and evaluation strategies: A case study
This paper presents a case study aimed at understanding and comparing integrated strategies for software measurement and evaluation, considering a strategy as a resource from the assessed entity standpoint. The evaluation focus is on the quality of the capabilities of a measurement and evaluation strategy taking into account three key aspects: i) the conceptual framework, centered on a terminological base, ii) the explicit specification of the process, and iii) the methodological/technological support. We consider a strategy is integrated if to great extent these three capabilities are met simultaneously. In the illustrated case study two strategies i.e. GQM+Strategies (Goal-Question-Metric), and GOCAME (Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Measurement and Evaluation) are evaluated. The given results allowed us the understanding of strengths and weaknesses for both strategies, and planning improvement actions as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信