通过最优和次最优控制的宾夕法尼亚州立大学螺杆EVAD的最小功耗

G. Klute, U. Tsach, D. Geselowitz
{"title":"通过最优和次最优控制的宾夕法尼亚州立大学螺杆EVAD的最小功耗","authors":"G. Klute, U. Tsach, D. Geselowitz","doi":"10.1109/NEBC.1988.19347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An output feedback controller for the Penn State rollerscrew electric ventricular assist device (EVAD) is discussed. The controller minimizes the electrical energy consumption while using the only observable state variable as its signal. The initial conditions on which the optimal control of the EVAD depends are based on cardiovascular data of the general population. Comparison of the Rollerscrew EVAD with the Cam EVAD reveals a striking difference in efficiency between the two devices. A patient with an optimally controlled Rollerscrew EVAD could function for 14.5 h without a recharge while the same patient with an optimally controlled Cam EVAD could function only for 8 h.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":165980,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1988 Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal power consumption of the Penn State rollerscrew EVAD through optimal and suboptimal control\",\"authors\":\"G. Klute, U. Tsach, D. Geselowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NEBC.1988.19347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An output feedback controller for the Penn State rollerscrew electric ventricular assist device (EVAD) is discussed. The controller minimizes the electrical energy consumption while using the only observable state variable as its signal. The initial conditions on which the optimal control of the EVAD depends are based on cardiovascular data of the general population. Comparison of the Rollerscrew EVAD with the Cam EVAD reveals a striking difference in efficiency between the two devices. A patient with an optimally controlled Rollerscrew EVAD could function for 14.5 h without a recharge while the same patient with an optimally controlled Cam EVAD could function only for 8 h.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":165980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1988 Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1988 Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEBC.1988.19347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1988 Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEBC.1988.19347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

讨论了宾夕法尼亚州立大学螺旋式电动心室辅助装置(EVAD)的输出反馈控制器。控制器在使用唯一可观察的状态变量作为其信号时,使电能消耗最小化。EVAD最优控制所依赖的初始条件是基于一般人群的心血管数据。滚动螺杆EVAD与凸轮EVAD的比较揭示了两种设备之间效率的显著差异。使用最佳控制的Rollerscrew EVAD的患者无需充电即可正常工作14.5小时,而使用最佳控制的Cam EVAD的患者只能正常工作8小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal power consumption of the Penn State rollerscrew EVAD through optimal and suboptimal control
An output feedback controller for the Penn State rollerscrew electric ventricular assist device (EVAD) is discussed. The controller minimizes the electrical energy consumption while using the only observable state variable as its signal. The initial conditions on which the optimal control of the EVAD depends are based on cardiovascular data of the general population. Comparison of the Rollerscrew EVAD with the Cam EVAD reveals a striking difference in efficiency between the two devices. A patient with an optimally controlled Rollerscrew EVAD could function for 14.5 h without a recharge while the same patient with an optimally controlled Cam EVAD could function only for 8 h.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信