脱离工会:澳大利亚的一个案例

J. Teicher
{"title":"脱离工会:澳大利亚的一个案例","authors":"J. Teicher","doi":"10.26686/NZJIR.V11I3.3593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the concept of breakaway unions and places it within the Australian institutional context. The concept is then applied to a particular case involving power station operators, a group of which seceded from one union and merged with another while retaining their group autonomy. This somewhat novel approach to circumventing the constraints of registration under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act highlights the limitations of industrial style unions in representing a diverse membership.","PeriodicalId":365392,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breakaway Unions: an Australian Case\",\"authors\":\"J. Teicher\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/NZJIR.V11I3.3593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the concept of breakaway unions and places it within the Australian institutional context. The concept is then applied to a particular case involving power station operators, a group of which seceded from one union and merged with another while retaining their group autonomy. This somewhat novel approach to circumventing the constraints of registration under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act highlights the limitations of industrial style unions in representing a diverse membership.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand journal of industrial relations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand journal of industrial relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZJIR.V11I3.3593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZJIR.V11I3.3593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考察了分离工会的概念,并将其置于澳大利亚的制度背景下。然后,这个概念被应用到一个涉及电站运营商的特殊案例中,电站运营商从一个工会中分离出来,与另一个工会合并,同时保留了集团的自主权。这种规避《调解和仲裁法》规定的注册限制的新颖做法,突出了工业式工会在代表多样化成员方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breakaway Unions: an Australian Case
This paper examines the concept of breakaway unions and places it within the Australian institutional context. The concept is then applied to a particular case involving power station operators, a group of which seceded from one union and merged with another while retaining their group autonomy. This somewhat novel approach to circumventing the constraints of registration under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act highlights the limitations of industrial style unions in representing a diverse membership.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信