M. Kessentini, Wael Kessentini, H. Sahraoui, M. Boukadoum, Ali Ouni
{"title":"设计缺陷检测与修正实例","authors":"M. Kessentini, Wael Kessentini, H. Sahraoui, M. Boukadoum, Ali Ouni","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2011.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting and fixing defects make programs easier to understand by developers. We propose an automated approach for the detection and correction of various types of design defects in source code. Our approach allows to automatically find detection rules, thus relieving the designer from doing so manually. Rules are defined as combinations of metrics/thresholds that better conform to known instances of design defects (defect examples). The correction solutions, a combination of refactoring operations, should minimize, as much as possible, the number of defects detected using the detection rules. In our setting, we use genetic programming for rule extraction. For the correction step, we use genetic algorithm. We evaluate our approach by finding and fixing potential defects in four open-source systems. For all these systems, we found, in average, more than 80% of known defects, a better result when compared to a state-of-the-art approach, where the detection rules are manually or semi-automatically specified. The proposed corrections fix, in average, more than 78%of detected defects.","PeriodicalId":345601,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension","volume":"1989 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"121","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Defects Detection and Correction by Example\",\"authors\":\"M. Kessentini, Wael Kessentini, H. Sahraoui, M. Boukadoum, Ali Ouni\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPC.2011.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detecting and fixing defects make programs easier to understand by developers. We propose an automated approach for the detection and correction of various types of design defects in source code. Our approach allows to automatically find detection rules, thus relieving the designer from doing so manually. Rules are defined as combinations of metrics/thresholds that better conform to known instances of design defects (defect examples). The correction solutions, a combination of refactoring operations, should minimize, as much as possible, the number of defects detected using the detection rules. In our setting, we use genetic programming for rule extraction. For the correction step, we use genetic algorithm. We evaluate our approach by finding and fixing potential defects in four open-source systems. For all these systems, we found, in average, more than 80% of known defects, a better result when compared to a state-of-the-art approach, where the detection rules are manually or semi-automatically specified. The proposed corrections fix, in average, more than 78%of detected defects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension\",\"volume\":\"1989 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"121\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2011.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2011.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design Defects Detection and Correction by Example
Detecting and fixing defects make programs easier to understand by developers. We propose an automated approach for the detection and correction of various types of design defects in source code. Our approach allows to automatically find detection rules, thus relieving the designer from doing so manually. Rules are defined as combinations of metrics/thresholds that better conform to known instances of design defects (defect examples). The correction solutions, a combination of refactoring operations, should minimize, as much as possible, the number of defects detected using the detection rules. In our setting, we use genetic programming for rule extraction. For the correction step, we use genetic algorithm. We evaluate our approach by finding and fixing potential defects in four open-source systems. For all these systems, we found, in average, more than 80% of known defects, a better result when compared to a state-of-the-art approach, where the detection rules are manually or semi-automatically specified. The proposed corrections fix, in average, more than 78%of detected defects.