度量基础设施——未来的考虑

O. Samoilenko
{"title":"度量基础设施——未来的考虑","authors":"O. Samoilenko","doi":"10.33955/v3(2022)-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Futurology as science for predicting humanity progress is important for planning specific steps to be taken today. \nAuthor made an attempt of scientific prediction concerning development of such important measurement infrastructure components as comparisons of measurement standards, interlaboratory comparisons of measurement results and calibration. Current state of this measurement infrastructure component should be improved to meet the challenges of a complicated and changeable environment. Comparisons of measurement standards are not performed often. Number of participants is limited. CMCs are difficult to obtain. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations are separated from comparisons, etc. \nIdea of measurement infrastructure future improvement is substantiated. Global informatization provides advantages and opportunities for it. \nThe answer to modern challenges is seen in the creation of the Comprehensive Measurement Traceability Network (hereinafter — the Network). The Network is assumed to be the most automated and consequently, the fastest, the most dynamic and comprehensive. Various levels of comparisons for various measurement methods and submethods can be initiated fast, easy and without restrictions. They can be provided continuously, without interruptions. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations should be directly linked to comparisons of measurement standards in the Network. Interlaboratory comparisons initiated in the Network differ from comparisons of measurement standards only in the factor that they will be initiated for working measurement standards and instruments. Subjective human factors in initiating, planning, processing and analyzing measurement results will be significantly reduced in the Network. \nThe purpose, basic (but not all) tasks and principles of such Network future work are formulated. Its advantages are underlined.","PeriodicalId":139019,"journal":{"name":"Measurements infrastructure","volume":"1989 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurements infrastructure — futurological considerations\",\"authors\":\"O. Samoilenko\",\"doi\":\"10.33955/v3(2022)-012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Futurology as science for predicting humanity progress is important for planning specific steps to be taken today. \\nAuthor made an attempt of scientific prediction concerning development of such important measurement infrastructure components as comparisons of measurement standards, interlaboratory comparisons of measurement results and calibration. Current state of this measurement infrastructure component should be improved to meet the challenges of a complicated and changeable environment. Comparisons of measurement standards are not performed often. Number of participants is limited. CMCs are difficult to obtain. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations are separated from comparisons, etc. \\nIdea of measurement infrastructure future improvement is substantiated. Global informatization provides advantages and opportunities for it. \\nThe answer to modern challenges is seen in the creation of the Comprehensive Measurement Traceability Network (hereinafter — the Network). The Network is assumed to be the most automated and consequently, the fastest, the most dynamic and comprehensive. Various levels of comparisons for various measurement methods and submethods can be initiated fast, easy and without restrictions. They can be provided continuously, without interruptions. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations should be directly linked to comparisons of measurement standards in the Network. Interlaboratory comparisons initiated in the Network differ from comparisons of measurement standards only in the factor that they will be initiated for working measurement standards and instruments. Subjective human factors in initiating, planning, processing and analyzing measurement results will be significantly reduced in the Network. \\nThe purpose, basic (but not all) tasks and principles of such Network future work are formulated. Its advantages are underlined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":139019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurements infrastructure\",\"volume\":\"1989 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurements infrastructure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33955/v3(2022)-012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurements infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33955/v3(2022)-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未来学作为预测人类进步的科学,对于规划今天要采取的具体步骤非常重要。对计量标准比对、计量结果实验室间比对、校准等重要计量基础设施的发展进行了科学预测的尝试。应该改进这个度量基础设施组件的当前状态,以满足复杂多变环境的挑战。不经常进行测量标准的比较。参加人数有限。cmc很难获得。实验室间的比较和校准与比较等分开。验证了度量基础设施未来改进的思路。全球信息化为中国提供了优势和机遇。应对现代挑战的答案是创建综合测量溯源网络(以下简称网络)。该网络被认为是自动化程度最高的,因此也是最快、最具活力和最全面的。各种测量方法和子方法的各种级别的比较可以快速,容易和无限制地启动。它们可以不间断地持续提供。实验室间的比较和校准应直接与网络中测量标准的比较联系起来。网络中启动的实验室间比较与测量标准的比较的不同之处在于,它们将针对工作测量标准和仪器启动。在网络中,在发起、计划、处理和分析测量结果时的主观人为因素将大大减少。制定了该网络未来工作的宗旨、基本(但不是全部)任务和原则。它的优势得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurements infrastructure — futurological considerations
Futurology as science for predicting humanity progress is important for planning specific steps to be taken today. Author made an attempt of scientific prediction concerning development of such important measurement infrastructure components as comparisons of measurement standards, interlaboratory comparisons of measurement results and calibration. Current state of this measurement infrastructure component should be improved to meet the challenges of a complicated and changeable environment. Comparisons of measurement standards are not performed often. Number of participants is limited. CMCs are difficult to obtain. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations are separated from comparisons, etc. Idea of measurement infrastructure future improvement is substantiated. Global informatization provides advantages and opportunities for it. The answer to modern challenges is seen in the creation of the Comprehensive Measurement Traceability Network (hereinafter — the Network). The Network is assumed to be the most automated and consequently, the fastest, the most dynamic and comprehensive. Various levels of comparisons for various measurement methods and submethods can be initiated fast, easy and without restrictions. They can be provided continuously, without interruptions. Interlaboratory comparisons and calibrations should be directly linked to comparisons of measurement standards in the Network. Interlaboratory comparisons initiated in the Network differ from comparisons of measurement standards only in the factor that they will be initiated for working measurement standards and instruments. Subjective human factors in initiating, planning, processing and analyzing measurement results will be significantly reduced in the Network. The purpose, basic (but not all) tasks and principles of such Network future work are formulated. Its advantages are underlined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信