关于血液检查的医患沟通:全科医学中的定性访谈研究

J. Watson, W. Hamilton, C. Salisbury, J. Banks
{"title":"关于血液检查的医患沟通:全科医学中的定性访谈研究","authors":"J. Watson, W. Hamilton, C. Salisbury, J. Banks","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Shared decision making is widely advocated, however most research focuses on treatment decisions. Evidence for shared decision-making in relation to diagnostic testing is limited to specific tests such as prostate specific antigen, screening and genetic tests. There is a lack of evidence regarding the relevance of shared decision-making to routine blood tests, despite increasing rates of laboratory testing in primary care. Objectives: To explore shared decision making and communication around routine blood tests in primary care. Study design: Qualitative interview study Setting:","PeriodicalId":115130,"journal":{"name":"Patient Engagement","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctor-patient communication about blood tests: Qualitative interview study in general practice\",\"authors\":\"J. Watson, W. Hamilton, C. Salisbury, J. Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Shared decision making is widely advocated, however most research focuses on treatment decisions. Evidence for shared decision-making in relation to diagnostic testing is limited to specific tests such as prostate specific antigen, screening and genetic tests. There is a lack of evidence regarding the relevance of shared decision-making to routine blood tests, despite increasing rates of laboratory testing in primary care. Objectives: To explore shared decision making and communication around routine blood tests in primary care. Study design: Qualitative interview study Setting:\",\"PeriodicalId\":115130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Engagement\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同决策被广泛提倡,然而大多数研究都集中在治疗决策上。在诊断检测方面共同决策的证据仅限于前列腺特异性抗原、筛查和基因检测等特定检测。尽管在初级保健中实验室检测的比率不断增加,但缺乏证据表明共同决策与常规血液检测的相关性。目的:探讨初级保健中常规血液检查的共同决策和沟通。研究设计:定性访谈研究设置:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doctor-patient communication about blood tests: Qualitative interview study in general practice
Context: Shared decision making is widely advocated, however most research focuses on treatment decisions. Evidence for shared decision-making in relation to diagnostic testing is limited to specific tests such as prostate specific antigen, screening and genetic tests. There is a lack of evidence regarding the relevance of shared decision-making to routine blood tests, despite increasing rates of laboratory testing in primary care. Objectives: To explore shared decision making and communication around routine blood tests in primary care. Study design: Qualitative interview study Setting:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信