文本评估与用户测试:比较分析

T. H. O. D. Silva, L. M. Freitas, M. Mendes, E. Furtado
{"title":"文本评估与用户测试:比较分析","authors":"T. H. O. D. Silva, L. M. Freitas, M. Mendes, E. Furtado","doi":"10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the ways to evaluate a system is from Textual Evaluation. This type of evaluation consider the textual user’s opinions to infer aspects of the interaction with the system. Although this method covers many texts and consi- ders spontaneous narratives of the users, it takes a lot of time and effort. Some authors have reported on the need to compare evaluations techniques in order to investigate their effectiveness in revealing issue or to supplement the results of a systems assessment. This study presents a comparative analysis between the textual evaluation and user testing. A case study was performed evaluating the usability and user experience of a health app. As a result, the techniques were analyzed based on aspects that involved describing the results, resources needed and description of problems and users.","PeriodicalId":330963,"journal":{"name":"Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textual evaluation vs. User testing: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"T. H. O. D. Silva, L. M. Freitas, M. Mendes, E. Furtado\",\"doi\":\"10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the ways to evaluate a system is from Textual Evaluation. This type of evaluation consider the textual user’s opinions to infer aspects of the interaction with the system. Although this method covers many texts and consi- ders spontaneous narratives of the users, it takes a lot of time and effort. Some authors have reported on the need to compare evaluations techniques in order to investigate their effectiveness in revealing issue or to supplement the results of a systems assessment. This study presents a comparative analysis between the textual evaluation and user testing. A case study was performed evaluating the usability and user experience of a health app. As a result, the techniques were analyzed based on aspects that involved describing the results, resources needed and description of problems and users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

文本评价是评价系统的一种方法。这种类型的评估考虑文本用户的意见来推断与系统交互的各个方面。虽然这种方法涵盖了许多文本,并考虑了用户的自发叙述,但它需要花费大量的时间和精力。一些作者报告了比较评价技术的必要性,以便调查它们在揭示问题或补充系统评价结果方面的有效性。本文对文本评价和用户测试进行了对比分析。通过案例研究,评估了一款健康应用的可用性和用户体验。因此,基于描述结果、所需资源、问题和用户描述等方面,对这些技术进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Textual evaluation vs. User testing: a comparative analysis
One of the ways to evaluate a system is from Textual Evaluation. This type of evaluation consider the textual user’s opinions to infer aspects of the interaction with the system. Although this method covers many texts and consi- ders spontaneous narratives of the users, it takes a lot of time and effort. Some authors have reported on the need to compare evaluations techniques in order to investigate their effectiveness in revealing issue or to supplement the results of a systems assessment. This study presents a comparative analysis between the textual evaluation and user testing. A case study was performed evaluating the usability and user experience of a health app. As a result, the techniques were analyzed based on aspects that involved describing the results, resources needed and description of problems and users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信