人类决策的计算模型:前景理论研究

Nimisha Gupta, M. K. Ahirwal, M. Atulkar
{"title":"人类决策的计算模型:前景理论研究","authors":"Nimisha Gupta, M. K. Ahirwal, M. Atulkar","doi":"10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2018.8722415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making can be defined as a process of selecting best alternatives among several possible alternatives. In this paper, two decision making theories are compared with the decision of several humans. Decision making theories used in this paper are Expected Utility Theory (EUT) and Prospect Theory (PT). Results are obtained and compared over the examples of gambles. Each example of gamble offers the choice with certainty and uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to explain how people behave while making decision and how decision making theories predict the decision of peoples.","PeriodicalId":175757,"journal":{"name":"2018 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Model for Human Decision Making: A Study of Prospect Theory\",\"authors\":\"Nimisha Gupta, M. K. Ahirwal, M. Atulkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2018.8722415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision making can be defined as a process of selecting best alternatives among several possible alternatives. In this paper, two decision making theories are compared with the decision of several humans. Decision making theories used in this paper are Expected Utility Theory (EUT) and Prospect Theory (PT). Results are obtained and compared over the examples of gambles. Each example of gamble offers the choice with certainty and uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to explain how people behave while making decision and how decision making theories predict the decision of peoples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2018.8722415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMTECH.2018.8722415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

决策可以定义为在几个可能的方案中选择最佳方案的过程。本文将两种决策理论与几个人的决策进行了比较。本文运用的决策理论主要有期望效用理论(EUT)和前景理论(PT)。结果得到,并与赌博的例子进行比较。每个赌博的例子都提供了确定性和不确定性的选择。本文的目的是解释人们在决策时的行为以及决策理论如何预测人们的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational Model for Human Decision Making: A Study of Prospect Theory
Decision making can be defined as a process of selecting best alternatives among several possible alternatives. In this paper, two decision making theories are compared with the decision of several humans. Decision making theories used in this paper are Expected Utility Theory (EUT) and Prospect Theory (PT). Results are obtained and compared over the examples of gambles. Each example of gamble offers the choice with certainty and uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to explain how people behave while making decision and how decision making theories predict the decision of peoples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信