畜牧业政策的断裂:基于可持续发展目标的分析

Lígia Amoroso Galbiati, Axel Bastián Poque González, Nathalia Moreira dos Santos, R. Palmieri, Evelin Ribeiro Rodrigues
{"title":"畜牧业政策的断裂:基于可持续发展目标的分析","authors":"Lígia Amoroso Galbiati, Axel Bastián Poque González, Nathalia Moreira dos Santos, R. Palmieri, Evelin Ribeiro Rodrigues","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220021l5oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Brazil has experienced a notable weakening of its institutional framework related to the implementation of an agenda for sustainability since the Jair Bolsonaro Administration. Aiming to identify trends and ruptures, this paper explores four axes of current Brazilian environmental governance, taking four Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an analysis tool: Gender (SDG 5), Energy (SDG 7), Solid Waste (SDG 12), and Life on Land (SDG 15). The study is structured as a critical essay, supported by the historical evolution of the indicators associated with the analyzed SDGs. It is concluded that there has been a weakening of environmental governance, within an understanding of the importance of a multi-stakeholder articulation and participatory governance. It is verified that there cracks have developed since 2019 at the federal level, with a discontinuity in a number of key policies, while at the territorial levels, there are historical trends that already showed injustices in the social and environmental scope, which have been aggravated in the face of the COVID-19 crisis.","PeriodicalId":261125,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente & Sociedade","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ruptures from the cattle policy: An analysis according to the Sustainable Development Goals\",\"authors\":\"Lígia Amoroso Galbiati, Axel Bastián Poque González, Nathalia Moreira dos Santos, R. Palmieri, Evelin Ribeiro Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220021l5oa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Brazil has experienced a notable weakening of its institutional framework related to the implementation of an agenda for sustainability since the Jair Bolsonaro Administration. Aiming to identify trends and ruptures, this paper explores four axes of current Brazilian environmental governance, taking four Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an analysis tool: Gender (SDG 5), Energy (SDG 7), Solid Waste (SDG 12), and Life on Land (SDG 15). The study is structured as a critical essay, supported by the historical evolution of the indicators associated with the analyzed SDGs. It is concluded that there has been a weakening of environmental governance, within an understanding of the importance of a multi-stakeholder articulation and participatory governance. It is verified that there cracks have developed since 2019 at the federal level, with a discontinuity in a number of key policies, while at the territorial levels, there are historical trends that already showed injustices in the social and environmental scope, which have been aggravated in the face of the COVID-19 crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambiente & Sociedade\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambiente & Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220021l5oa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente & Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220021l5oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)政府执政以来,巴西在实施可持续发展议程方面的制度框架明显减弱。为了确定趋势和断裂,本文探讨了当前巴西环境治理的四个轴,以四个可持续发展目标(SDG)作为分析工具:性别(SDG 5),能源(SDG 7),固体废物(SDG 12)和陆地生命(SDG 15)。该研究的结构是一篇批判性文章,并以与所分析的可持续发展目标相关的指标的历史演变为支撑。本文的结论是,在对多方利益相关者的联系和参与式治理的重要性的理解范围内,环境治理的力度有所减弱。经核实,自2019年以来,在联邦一级出现了裂缝,一些关键政策出现了不连续性,而在地区一级,已经出现了社会和环境方面的不公正的历史趋势,面对2019冠状病毒病危机,这种趋势进一步加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ruptures from the cattle policy: An analysis according to the Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract Brazil has experienced a notable weakening of its institutional framework related to the implementation of an agenda for sustainability since the Jair Bolsonaro Administration. Aiming to identify trends and ruptures, this paper explores four axes of current Brazilian environmental governance, taking four Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as an analysis tool: Gender (SDG 5), Energy (SDG 7), Solid Waste (SDG 12), and Life on Land (SDG 15). The study is structured as a critical essay, supported by the historical evolution of the indicators associated with the analyzed SDGs. It is concluded that there has been a weakening of environmental governance, within an understanding of the importance of a multi-stakeholder articulation and participatory governance. It is verified that there cracks have developed since 2019 at the federal level, with a discontinuity in a number of key policies, while at the territorial levels, there are historical trends that already showed injustices in the social and environmental scope, which have been aggravated in the face of the COVID-19 crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信