澳大利亚外商投资法规、条约和投资者-国家仲裁的演变

L. Nottage
{"title":"澳大利亚外商投资法规、条约和投资者-国家仲裁的演变","authors":"L. Nottage","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2685941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the historical evolution of Australia’s foreign direct investment (FDI) regulation generally, under national law and more recently bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or investment chapters of free trade agreements (FTAs). This sets the stage for closer analysis of the policy and politics in Australia over treaty-based investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), particularly the binding arbitration mechanism since 2010. The paper concludes by highlighting some key contrasts with ISDS debates in New Zealand, a close trading and investment partner. It has retained more bipartisan support for ISDS in recent years, and FTAs generally, despite emergent concerns in the context of the Korea and Trans-Pacific Partnership FTAs.","PeriodicalId":196892,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Foreign Investment Regulation, Treaties and Investor-State Arbitration in Australia\",\"authors\":\"L. Nottage\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2685941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper outlines the historical evolution of Australia’s foreign direct investment (FDI) regulation generally, under national law and more recently bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or investment chapters of free trade agreements (FTAs). This sets the stage for closer analysis of the policy and politics in Australia over treaty-based investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), particularly the binding arbitration mechanism since 2010. The paper concludes by highlighting some key contrasts with ISDS debates in New Zealand, a close trading and investment partner. It has retained more bipartisan support for ISDS in recent years, and FTAs generally, despite emergent concerns in the context of the Korea and Trans-Pacific Partnership FTAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2685941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law & Analysis (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2685941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文概述了澳大利亚根据国家法律和最近的双边投资条约(BITs)或自由贸易协定(FTAs)的投资章节对外国直接投资(FDI)监管的历史演变。这为深入分析澳大利亚基于条约的投资者-国家争端解决机制(ISDS)的政策和政治,特别是自2010年以来的约束性仲裁机制奠定了基础。该报告最后强调了新西兰(一个密切的贸易和投资伙伴)与ISDS辩论的一些关键对比。近年来,尽管在韩国和跨太平洋伙伴关系自由贸易协定的背景下出现了一些担忧,但它仍然保留了对ISDS和一般自由贸易协定的更多两党支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of Foreign Investment Regulation, Treaties and Investor-State Arbitration in Australia
This paper outlines the historical evolution of Australia’s foreign direct investment (FDI) regulation generally, under national law and more recently bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or investment chapters of free trade agreements (FTAs). This sets the stage for closer analysis of the policy and politics in Australia over treaty-based investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), particularly the binding arbitration mechanism since 2010. The paper concludes by highlighting some key contrasts with ISDS debates in New Zealand, a close trading and investment partner. It has retained more bipartisan support for ISDS in recent years, and FTAs generally, despite emergent concerns in the context of the Korea and Trans-Pacific Partnership FTAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信