自动丢弃带状线提高抽象新闻摘要的数据质量

Amr Keleg, Matthias Lindemann, Danyang Liu, Wanqiu Long, B. Webber
{"title":"自动丢弃带状线提高抽象新闻摘要的数据质量","authors":"Amr Keleg, Matthias Lindemann, Danyang Liu, Wanqiu Long, B. Webber","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent improvements in automatic news summarization fundamentally rely on large corpora of news articles and their summaries. These corpora are often constructed by scraping news websites, which results in including not only summaries but also other kinds of texts. Apart from more generic noise, we identify straplines as a form of text scraped from news websites that commonly turn out not to be summaries. The presence of these non-summaries threatens the validity of scraped corpora as benchmarks for news summarization. We have annotated extracts from two news sources that form part of the Newsroom corpus (Grusky et al., 2018), labeling those which were straplines, those which were summaries, and those which were both. We present a rule-based strapline detection method that achieves good performance on a manually annotated test set. Automatic evaluation indicates that removing straplines and noise from the training data of a news summarizer results in higher quality summaries, with improvements as high as 7 points ROUGE score.","PeriodicalId":242673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of NLP Power! The First Workshop on Efficient Benchmarking in NLP","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatically Discarding Straplines to Improve Data Quality for Abstractive News Summarization\",\"authors\":\"Amr Keleg, Matthias Lindemann, Danyang Liu, Wanqiu Long, B. Webber\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent improvements in automatic news summarization fundamentally rely on large corpora of news articles and their summaries. These corpora are often constructed by scraping news websites, which results in including not only summaries but also other kinds of texts. Apart from more generic noise, we identify straplines as a form of text scraped from news websites that commonly turn out not to be summaries. The presence of these non-summaries threatens the validity of scraped corpora as benchmarks for news summarization. We have annotated extracts from two news sources that form part of the Newsroom corpus (Grusky et al., 2018), labeling those which were straplines, those which were summaries, and those which were both. We present a rule-based strapline detection method that achieves good performance on a manually annotated test set. Automatic evaluation indicates that removing straplines and noise from the training data of a news summarizer results in higher quality summaries, with improvements as high as 7 points ROUGE score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of NLP Power! The First Workshop on Efficient Benchmarking in NLP\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of NLP Power! The First Workshop on Efficient Benchmarking in NLP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of NLP Power! The First Workshop on Efficient Benchmarking in NLP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近自动新闻摘要的改进基本上依赖于新闻文章及其摘要的大型语料库。这些语料库通常是通过抓取新闻网站构建的,结果不仅包括摘要,还包括其他类型的文本。除了更常见的杂音外,我们还将摘要定义为从新闻网站上抓取的一种文本形式,通常被证明不是摘要。这些非摘要的存在威胁着抽取的语料库作为新闻摘要基准的有效性。我们对构成Newsroom语料库一部分的两个新闻来源的摘录进行了注释(Grusky等人,2018),标记了那些是概括性的,那些是摘要的,以及那些两者都是。我们提出了一种基于规则的带状线检测方法,该方法在手动标注的测试集上取得了良好的性能。自动评估表明,从新闻摘要器的训练数据中去除带状线和噪声可以获得更高质量的摘要,其ROUGE得分提高高达7分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatically Discarding Straplines to Improve Data Quality for Abstractive News Summarization
Recent improvements in automatic news summarization fundamentally rely on large corpora of news articles and their summaries. These corpora are often constructed by scraping news websites, which results in including not only summaries but also other kinds of texts. Apart from more generic noise, we identify straplines as a form of text scraped from news websites that commonly turn out not to be summaries. The presence of these non-summaries threatens the validity of scraped corpora as benchmarks for news summarization. We have annotated extracts from two news sources that form part of the Newsroom corpus (Grusky et al., 2018), labeling those which were straplines, those which were summaries, and those which were both. We present a rule-based strapline detection method that achieves good performance on a manually annotated test set. Automatic evaluation indicates that removing straplines and noise from the training data of a news summarizer results in higher quality summaries, with improvements as high as 7 points ROUGE score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信