VRF空调系统与传统家用空调系统的比较研究

{"title":"VRF空调系统与传统家用空调系统的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.58908/tmuj.v6i1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All over the world there is a call to encourage sustainable energy thinking and implementation. There is an urgent need to consider sustainable solutions that are able to reduce energy consumption cost. In air conditioning field, the rise of the variable refrigerant flow systems has made big progress. This study focuses on cost analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility of conventional, VRF and VRF duct type air conditioning system. The hourly and daily energy consumption of both systems were characterized based on corresponding outdoor air temperatures. Results showed that VRF air conditioning system is 15% less costly than conventional air condition. Though VRF duct system is less costly than conventional VRF, the standard rooftop height of the studied building doesn’t support VRF duct type installation. Besides the open ducting line up will not look good and creating cover for these duct will pile up the cost further. The analysis also shows that the VRF system uses 17% and 73% less energy than the rooftop System in cooling and heating seasons, respectively. The implementation of this pilot result on National level will promote the use of sustainable energy technologies such as VRF system.","PeriodicalId":376426,"journal":{"name":"The Millennium University Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of VRF Air Conditioning System over the Conventional Domestic Air-Conditioning System\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.58908/tmuj.v6i1.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All over the world there is a call to encourage sustainable energy thinking and implementation. There is an urgent need to consider sustainable solutions that are able to reduce energy consumption cost. In air conditioning field, the rise of the variable refrigerant flow systems has made big progress. This study focuses on cost analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility of conventional, VRF and VRF duct type air conditioning system. The hourly and daily energy consumption of both systems were characterized based on corresponding outdoor air temperatures. Results showed that VRF air conditioning system is 15% less costly than conventional air condition. Though VRF duct system is less costly than conventional VRF, the standard rooftop height of the studied building doesn’t support VRF duct type installation. Besides the open ducting line up will not look good and creating cover for these duct will pile up the cost further. The analysis also shows that the VRF system uses 17% and 73% less energy than the rooftop System in cooling and heating seasons, respectively. The implementation of this pilot result on National level will promote the use of sustainable energy technologies such as VRF system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Millennium University Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Millennium University Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58908/tmuj.v6i1.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Millennium University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58908/tmuj.v6i1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界都在呼吁鼓励可持续能源的思考和实施。迫切需要考虑能够降低能源消耗成本的可持续解决方案。在空调领域,变制冷剂流量系统的兴起取得了很大的进步。本研究的重点是成本分析,以评估传统、VRF和VRF风管式空调系统的经济可行性。两个系统的每小时和每天的能源消耗是基于相应的室外空气温度来表征的。结果表明,VRF空调系统比传统空调系统成本低15%。虽然VRF风管系统比传统VRF系统成本低,但研究建筑的标准屋顶高度不支持VRF风管式安装。此外,开放的管道线不会看起来很好,为这些管道创建覆盖将进一步增加成本。分析还表明,在制冷和供暖季节,VRF系统的能耗分别比屋顶系统低17%和73%。这一试点成果在国家层面的实施将促进VRF系统等可持续能源技术的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of VRF Air Conditioning System over the Conventional Domestic Air-Conditioning System
All over the world there is a call to encourage sustainable energy thinking and implementation. There is an urgent need to consider sustainable solutions that are able to reduce energy consumption cost. In air conditioning field, the rise of the variable refrigerant flow systems has made big progress. This study focuses on cost analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility of conventional, VRF and VRF duct type air conditioning system. The hourly and daily energy consumption of both systems were characterized based on corresponding outdoor air temperatures. Results showed that VRF air conditioning system is 15% less costly than conventional air condition. Though VRF duct system is less costly than conventional VRF, the standard rooftop height of the studied building doesn’t support VRF duct type installation. Besides the open ducting line up will not look good and creating cover for these duct will pile up the cost further. The analysis also shows that the VRF system uses 17% and 73% less energy than the rooftop System in cooling and heating seasons, respectively. The implementation of this pilot result on National level will promote the use of sustainable energy technologies such as VRF system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信