解读CRA观察公告对欧洲国债收益率的影响:CRAII监管事前和事后效应的实证检验

Samunderu Eyden, Layher Nicolleta
{"title":"解读CRA观察公告对欧洲国债收益率的影响:CRAII监管事前和事后效应的实证检验","authors":"Samunderu Eyden, Layher Nicolleta","doi":"10.54646/bijomrp.2022.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to analyze whether there is a correlation between credit rating agencies’ (CRAs) watchannouncements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of the CRAII Regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the riskassociated with investing in sovereign bonds. However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereignbond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands,Ireland, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. These countries’ samples represent the empirical analysis of our study. Dataused for this analysis include information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements fromStandard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service, and Fitch Ratings, and interest rate volatilityare all extrapolated from the Bloomberg database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940to 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regression tests to determine whether there is evidence that achange in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies beforeand after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watchannouncements. According to theF-test andp-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with 10 and 5-yearmaturities shows statistical significance in both situations at 95 and 99% confidence levels. With 0 for all regressionanalyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant","PeriodicalId":433289,"journal":{"name":"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the impact of CRA’s watch announcement on EUsovereign bond yields: empirical examination ofEx Anteand post ante effects of the CRAII regulation\",\"authors\":\"Samunderu Eyden, Layher Nicolleta\",\"doi\":\"10.54646/bijomrp.2022.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to analyze whether there is a correlation between credit rating agencies’ (CRAs) watchannouncements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of the CRAII Regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the riskassociated with investing in sovereign bonds. However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereignbond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands,Ireland, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. These countries’ samples represent the empirical analysis of our study. Dataused for this analysis include information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements fromStandard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service, and Fitch Ratings, and interest rate volatilityare all extrapolated from the Bloomberg database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940to 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regression tests to determine whether there is evidence that achange in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies beforeand after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watchannouncements. According to theF-test andp-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with 10 and 5-yearmaturities shows statistical significance in both situations at 95 and 99% confidence levels. With 0 for all regressionanalyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant\",\"PeriodicalId\":433289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijomrp.2022.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOHR International Journal of Operations Management Research and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijomrp.2022.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析信用评级机构对欧盟主权债券收益率的观察公告与CRAII法规实施后欧盟主权债券收益率之间是否存在相关性。从理论上讲,评级机构的作用是向投资者提供有关投资主权债券风险的关键信息。然而,评级机构是否会影响欧盟主权债券收益率仍不清楚。奥地利、德国、比利时、芬兰、法国、荷兰、爱尔兰、意大利、西班牙和葡萄牙的主权债券收益率被征收。这些国家的样本代表了我们研究的实证分析。该分析使用的数据包括欧洲主权债券收益率信息,标准普尔金融服务公司、穆迪投资者服务公司和惠誉评级公司的信用观察公告,以及从彭博数据库推断的利率波动。欧洲主权债券收益率的统计时间为1940年至2015年。我们的研究进行了多元线性回归测试,以确定是否有证据表明收益率的变化是由三大信用评级机构在引入CRA II法规之前和之后发布的观察公告决定的,因此,评级机构是否通过其观察公告影响收益率。根据f检验和p值结果,对10年期和5年期主权债券的研究在95%和99%的置信水平上都具有统计显著性。所有回归分析均为0,利率波动也具有统计显著性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking the impact of CRA’s watch announcement on EUsovereign bond yields: empirical examination ofEx Anteand post ante effects of the CRAII regulation
The study aims to analyze whether there is a correlation between credit rating agencies’ (CRAs) watchannouncements on EU sovereign bond yields and EU sovereign bond yields after the implementation of the CRAII Regulation. In theory, the role of rating agencies is to provide key information to investors regarding the riskassociated with investing in sovereign bonds. However, it remains unclear whether CRAs influence EU sovereignbond yields. Sovereign bond yields are collected for Austria, Germany, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands,Ireland, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. These countries’ samples represent the empirical analysis of our study. Dataused for this analysis include information on European sovereign bond yields, credit watch announcements fromStandard & Poor’s Financial Services, Moody’s Investors Service, and Fitch Ratings, and interest rate volatilityare all extrapolated from the Bloomberg database. European sovereign bond yields are collected from 1940to 2015. Our study conducted multiple linear regression tests to determine whether there is evidence that achange in yield is determined by a watch announcement made by the big three credit rating agencies beforeand after the introduction of the CRA II Regulation and hence, whether CRAs do influence yields with their watchannouncements. According to theF-test andp-value results, the study of sovereign bonds with 10 and 5-yearmaturities shows statistical significance in both situations at 95 and 99% confidence levels. With 0 for all regressionanalyses, interest rate volatility is also statistically significant
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信