印度尼西亚公民在Covid-19疫苗接种政策方面的权利和义务有争议

Faizal Saman
{"title":"印度尼西亚公民在Covid-19疫苗接种政策方面的权利和义务有争议","authors":"Faizal Saman","doi":"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the rights and obligations of Indonesian citizens regarding vaccination.  This research uses a type of normative legal research with a statute approach.  Collect data by grouping and reviewing regulations, library materials, books, and other sources related to problems in this study.  The results showed that polemics that led to pros and cons related to vaccination were caused by several factors such as vaccines being new, the safety of vaccines that cannot be passed, and the sanctions imposed on those who refuse vaccines.  The pro-life community considers vaccination to be an obligation and the contras think that the imposition of vaccination is in line with the right to health.  There are several variables for the reason for the vaccination policy to be implemented, namely the state in a state of emergency, namely in a  pandemic crisis, and subsequently related to the human obligation to respect the human rights of others (the right to the health of others).  Thus, the problem of legal certainty from the implementation of vaccination is an obligation of Indonesian citizens.","PeriodicalId":309785,"journal":{"name":"Estudiante Law Journal","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debatable of Indonesian Citizens' Rights and Obligations Regarding the Covid-19 Vaccination Policy\",\"authors\":\"Faizal Saman\",\"doi\":\"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to examine the rights and obligations of Indonesian citizens regarding vaccination.  This research uses a type of normative legal research with a statute approach.  Collect data by grouping and reviewing regulations, library materials, books, and other sources related to problems in this study.  The results showed that polemics that led to pros and cons related to vaccination were caused by several factors such as vaccines being new, the safety of vaccines that cannot be passed, and the sanctions imposed on those who refuse vaccines.  The pro-life community considers vaccination to be an obligation and the contras think that the imposition of vaccination is in line with the right to health.  There are several variables for the reason for the vaccination policy to be implemented, namely the state in a state of emergency, namely in a  pandemic crisis, and subsequently related to the human obligation to respect the human rights of others (the right to the health of others).  Thus, the problem of legal certainty from the implementation of vaccination is an obligation of Indonesian citizens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudiante Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是审查印度尼西亚公民在疫苗接种方面的权利和义务。本研究采用一种规范的法律研究与成文法的方法。通过分组和审查与本研究问题相关的法规、图书馆资料、书籍和其他来源来收集数据。结果显示,与疫苗接种有关的赞成和反对争论是由新疫苗、不能通过的疫苗的安全性、拒绝接种疫苗的人受到的制裁等多种因素引起的。反堕胎团体认为接种疫苗是一项义务,而反对派认为强制接种疫苗符合健康权。实施疫苗接种政策的原因有几个可变因素,即国家处于紧急状态,即处于大流行病危机中,随后与人类尊重他人人权(他人健康权)的义务有关。因此,接种疫苗的法律确定性问题是印度尼西亚公民的一项义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debatable of Indonesian Citizens' Rights and Obligations Regarding the Covid-19 Vaccination Policy
The purpose of this study is to examine the rights and obligations of Indonesian citizens regarding vaccination.  This research uses a type of normative legal research with a statute approach.  Collect data by grouping and reviewing regulations, library materials, books, and other sources related to problems in this study.  The results showed that polemics that led to pros and cons related to vaccination were caused by several factors such as vaccines being new, the safety of vaccines that cannot be passed, and the sanctions imposed on those who refuse vaccines.  The pro-life community considers vaccination to be an obligation and the contras think that the imposition of vaccination is in line with the right to health.  There are several variables for the reason for the vaccination policy to be implemented, namely the state in a state of emergency, namely in a  pandemic crisis, and subsequently related to the human obligation to respect the human rights of others (the right to the health of others).  Thus, the problem of legal certainty from the implementation of vaccination is an obligation of Indonesian citizens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信