模型检查比特币和其他工作量证明共识协议

Max DiGiacomo-Castillo, Yiyun Liang, Advay Pal, John C. Mitchell
{"title":"模型检查比特币和其他工作量证明共识协议","authors":"Max DiGiacomo-Castillo, Yiyun Liang, Advay Pal, John C. Mitchell","doi":"10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol [4] is an abstraction of the bitcoin proof-of-work consensus protocol. We use a model-checking tool (UPPAAL-SMC) to examine the security of proof-of-work consensus by varying protocol parameters, using an adversary that leverages the selfish mining strategy introduced in [4]. We provide insights into modeling proof-of-work protocols and demonstrate trade-offs between operating parameters. Applying this methodology to protocol design, we show that the uniform tie-breaking rule from [11], an attempt to mitigate selfish mining, improves chain quality but decreases the common prefix probability. This trade-off illustrates how design decisions affect desirable protocol properties, within a range of concrete operating conditions, in a manner that is not evident from prior asymptotic analysis.","PeriodicalId":109440,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Checking Bitcoin and other Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols\",\"authors\":\"Max DiGiacomo-Castillo, Yiyun Liang, Advay Pal, John C. Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol [4] is an abstraction of the bitcoin proof-of-work consensus protocol. We use a model-checking tool (UPPAAL-SMC) to examine the security of proof-of-work consensus by varying protocol parameters, using an adversary that leverages the selfish mining strategy introduced in [4]. We provide insights into modeling proof-of-work protocols and demonstrate trade-offs between operating parameters. Applying this methodology to protocol design, we show that the uniform tie-breaking rule from [11], an attempt to mitigate selfish mining, improves chain quality but decreases the common prefix probability. This trade-off illustrates how design decisions affect desirable protocol properties, within a range of concrete operating conditions, in a manner that is not evident from prior asymptotic analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain50366.2020.00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

比特币骨干协议[4]是比特币工作量证明共识协议的抽象。我们使用模型检查工具(UPPAAL-SMC)通过不同的协议参数来检查工作量证明共识的安全性,使用利用[4]中引入的自私挖掘策略的对手。我们提供了对工作量证明协议建模的见解,并演示了操作参数之间的权衡。将该方法应用于协议设计,我们证明了[11]中的统一领带打破规则(试图减轻自私挖掘)提高了链质量,但降低了公共前缀概率。这种权衡说明了设计决策如何影响理想的协议属性,在一系列具体的操作条件下,以一种从先前的渐近分析中不明显的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Checking Bitcoin and other Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols
The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol [4] is an abstraction of the bitcoin proof-of-work consensus protocol. We use a model-checking tool (UPPAAL-SMC) to examine the security of proof-of-work consensus by varying protocol parameters, using an adversary that leverages the selfish mining strategy introduced in [4]. We provide insights into modeling proof-of-work protocols and demonstrate trade-offs between operating parameters. Applying this methodology to protocol design, we show that the uniform tie-breaking rule from [11], an attempt to mitigate selfish mining, improves chain quality but decreases the common prefix probability. This trade-off illustrates how design decisions affect desirable protocol properties, within a range of concrete operating conditions, in a manner that is not evident from prior asymptotic analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信