从科学文献中重新解读创业失败:文献计量学方法

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Luc Tessier, Maarouf Ramadan, Alexandre Renaud
{"title":"从科学文献中重新解读创业失败:文献计量学方法","authors":"Luc Tessier,&nbsp;Maarouf Ramadan,&nbsp;Alexandre Renaud","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Academic literature analyzing the conditions of entrepreneurial failure has emerged in the last decade. Failure can be interpreted in several ways: failure as the disappearance of the firm, failure based on flawed strategies, organizational failure, and failure defined by the entrepreneur's perception. We mobilize a bibliometric technique and identify different scientific conversations initiated between 2016 and 2021. We conducted a bibliometric study using the bibliographic linkage method on 198 articles. This article is divided into three sections. First, we review the methodological choices made, then we describe the results before discussing their generic implications for understanding the phenomenon of failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"41 4","pages":"465-491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rereading entrepreneurial failure from the scientific literature: A bibliometric approach\",\"authors\":\"Luc Tessier,&nbsp;Maarouf Ramadan,&nbsp;Alexandre Renaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Academic literature analyzing the conditions of entrepreneurial failure has emerged in the last decade. Failure can be interpreted in several ways: failure as the disappearance of the firm, failure based on flawed strategies, organizational failure, and failure defined by the entrepreneur's perception. We mobilize a bibliometric technique and identify different scientific conversations initiated between 2016 and 2021. We conducted a bibliometric study using the bibliographic linkage method on 198 articles. This article is divided into three sections. First, we review the methodological choices made, then we describe the results before discussing their generic implications for understanding the phenomenon of failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"465-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rereading entrepreneurial failure from the scientific literature: A bibliometric approach

Academic literature analyzing the conditions of entrepreneurial failure has emerged in the last decade. Failure can be interpreted in several ways: failure as the disappearance of the firm, failure based on flawed strategies, organizational failure, and failure defined by the entrepreneur's perception. We mobilize a bibliometric technique and identify different scientific conversations initiated between 2016 and 2021. We conducted a bibliometric study using the bibliographic linkage method on 198 articles. This article is divided into three sections. First, we review the methodological choices made, then we describe the results before discussing their generic implications for understanding the phenomenon of failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信