短跨板坯小箱围缩量研究

Sang-Yeon Kim
{"title":"短跨板坯小箱围缩量研究","authors":"Sang-Yeon Kim","doi":"10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.4.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are small box opening for inserting of electric lamp box in the slab of apartment. Around this box opening, we normally use the detailing of WWF or plastic ring strengthening to protect cracks induced by shrinkage. The shrinkage amount of slab box around was measured and analysed in order to consider validity of these strengthening methods and to find out economical alternative. Alternative of strengthening methods are normally used strengthening methods in construction companies, which are WWF strengthening, plastic ring strengthening and no strengthening methods. The shrinkage amount was measured using contact guage at the spot of tip attached around the box on slab of small area unit apartment which have small exclusive area below 59 ㎡ . Measured data shows that there are no big differences between all the 3 strengthening methods and Measure data range is -264 με ~ +216 με . Measured shrinkage is on trend slightly increase till 3~5weeks after removal of forms and then decrease. But amount of shrinkage are very low for all the slabs and there are no probabilities of concrete crack by shrinkage.","PeriodicalId":365439,"journal":{"name":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Shrinkage around Small Box of Short Span Slab\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Yeon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.4.323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are small box opening for inserting of electric lamp box in the slab of apartment. Around this box opening, we normally use the detailing of WWF or plastic ring strengthening to protect cracks induced by shrinkage. The shrinkage amount of slab box around was measured and analysed in order to consider validity of these strengthening methods and to find out economical alternative. Alternative of strengthening methods are normally used strengthening methods in construction companies, which are WWF strengthening, plastic ring strengthening and no strengthening methods. The shrinkage amount was measured using contact guage at the spot of tip attached around the box on slab of small area unit apartment which have small exclusive area below 59 ㎡ . Measured data shows that there are no big differences between all the 3 strengthening methods and Measure data range is -264 με ~ +216 με . Measured shrinkage is on trend slightly increase till 3~5weeks after removal of forms and then decrease. But amount of shrinkage are very low for all the slabs and there are no probabilities of concrete crack by shrinkage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.4.323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.4.323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公寓楼板上有插电灯箱的小箱口。在此箱口周围,我们通常使用WWF或塑料环加固的细节来保护收缩引起的裂缝。对板坯箱周围的收缩量进行了测量和分析,以考虑这些加固方法的有效性,寻找经济可行的替代方案。施工企业常用的加固方法有:WWF加固、塑料环加固和无加固。采用接触计对专用面积小于59㎡的小面积单户制公寓楼板箱体周围贴尖处的收缩量进行了测量。实测数据表明,3种强化方法之间差异不大,测量数据范围为-264 με ~ +216 με。在去模后3~5周,收缩率有小幅上升的趋势,然后下降。但所有楼板的收缩量都很低,不存在混凝土收缩开裂的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Shrinkage around Small Box of Short Span Slab
There are small box opening for inserting of electric lamp box in the slab of apartment. Around this box opening, we normally use the detailing of WWF or plastic ring strengthening to protect cracks induced by shrinkage. The shrinkage amount of slab box around was measured and analysed in order to consider validity of these strengthening methods and to find out economical alternative. Alternative of strengthening methods are normally used strengthening methods in construction companies, which are WWF strengthening, plastic ring strengthening and no strengthening methods. The shrinkage amount was measured using contact guage at the spot of tip attached around the box on slab of small area unit apartment which have small exclusive area below 59 ㎡ . Measured data shows that there are no big differences between all the 3 strengthening methods and Measure data range is -264 με ~ +216 με . Measured shrinkage is on trend slightly increase till 3~5weeks after removal of forms and then decrease. But amount of shrinkage are very low for all the slabs and there are no probabilities of concrete crack by shrinkage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信