运用思维配对、分享与头脑风暴策略对中低年级学生个人社会智力发展的影响:比较研究

N. Ibrahim, A. Hammad
{"title":"运用思维配对、分享与头脑风暴策略对中低年级学生个人社会智力发展的影响:比较研究","authors":"N. Ibrahim, A. Hammad","doi":"10.54940/ep80378302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.","PeriodicalId":402392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of employing think – pair and share vs brain storming strategy in the development of personal – social intelligence, among intermediate stage students: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"N. Ibrahim, A. Hammad\",\"doi\":\"10.54940/ep80378302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep80378302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep80378302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较事物配对和分享策略与头脑风暴策略对个人社会智力发展的影响。实验分为三组:第一组采用思维配对和分享策略;实验组采用头脑风暴教学,对照组采用传统教学策略。通过个人社会智力前测、创造性思维量表和后测收集数据。结果显示,实验组学生的均值与对照组学生的个人社会智力各单项得分有显著性差异(α≤0.05),其中实验组学生表现优于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of employing think – pair and share vs brain storming strategy in the development of personal – social intelligence, among intermediate stage students: A comparative study
: This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信